Generated by GPT-5-mini| Yisrael HaYom | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Name | Yisrael HaYom |
| Type | Free daily newspaper |
| Format | Tabloid |
| Founded | 2007 |
| Founder | Sheldon Adelson |
| Owner | Le Monde Group |
Yisrael HaYom Yisrael HaYom is an Israeli Hebrew-language free daily tabloid established in 2007. It operates within the Israeli media ecosystem alongside outlets such as Haaretz, The Jerusalem Post, Maariv, Yedioth Ahronoth, and Israel Hayom (note: different naming conventions) and has had notable influence on public debate involving figures like Benjamin Netanyahu, Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert, Shimon Peres. The newspaper's operations intersect with entities such as IDC Herzliya, Tel Aviv University, Bar-Ilan University, and regulatory bodies including the Israel Communications Authority.
The paper launched amid competition with long-established outlets like Haaretz, Yedioth Ahronoth, and Maariv and during a period marked by political events including the Second Lebanon War, the Gaza disengagement, and the 2006 Israeli legislative election. Founding decisions referenced media models from the United Kingdom and the United States such as distribution strategies used by Metro International and papers like The Sun, New York Post, Daily Mail, and USA Today. Early editorial hires included journalists from Channel 10 (Israel), Channel 2 (Israel), Army Radio (Galei Tzahal), and print veterans from Haaretz and Yedioth Ahronoth. Coverage expanded through major national events like the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict, the 2015 Israeli legislative election, and the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel.
Ownership structure attracted attention due to ties with international figures and corporations such as investors associated with Las Vegas Sands, philanthropic networks linked to Sheldon Adelson, and interactions with media conglomerates akin to News Corporation, Hearst Corporation, Gannett, and Schibsted. Financing mechanisms involved advertising campaigns from companies like Bezeq, Cellcom, Partner, and partnerships with retailers similar to Super-Pharm, Shufersal, and Rami Levy Hashikma Marketing in distribution arrangements. Financial scrutiny referenced institutions such as Bank Hapoalim, Bank Leumi, Israel Securities Authority, and policy debates involving legislators from Likud, Labor, Yesh Atid, Shas, and United Torah Judaism.
The editorial stance has been described in relation to politicians and parties including Benjamin Netanyahu, Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak, Avigdor Lieberman, and Naftali Bennett. Comparisons were made with editorial lines at The Wall Street Journal, The Times (London), and Der Spiegel for op-ed positioning. The outlet has featured columnists and contributors who have worked at The Jerusalem Post, Channel 12 (Israel), Reshet 13, KAN (Israel Broadcasting Corporation), and academic commentators from Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv University, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Bar-Ilan University, and Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. Coverage often intersected with debates around legislative initiatives such as the Nation-State Law, the Judicial Reform, and security operations like Operation Protective Edge.
Printed in tabloid format, the newspaper adopted distribution practices similar to Metro (free newspaper), targeting commuters at stations served by Israel Railways, Egged, and Dan Bus Company. It used promotional tactics resembling campaigns by The New York Times and The Guardian, including inserts, supplements, and weekend editions with lifestyle coverage paralleling Vogue (magazine), Time (magazine), and Haaretz Weekend. Production involved printing facilities comparable to those used by Yedioth Ahronoth and logistics firms operating in Port of Ashdod and Port of Haifa.
Circulation metrics were compared against figures reported for Yedioth Ahronoth, Maariv, and Haaretz and discussed in analyses by bodies like the Audit Bureau of Circulations and academic studies from Bar-Ilan University, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and Tel Aviv University. Readership demographics were analyzed relative to audiences of Channel 20 (Israel), i24news, and international diasporic outlets such as The Jewish Chronicle, The Forward, and The Times of Israel. Market studies referenced advertising rates in comparison to Bloomberg Businessweek and Forbes.
The outlet was central in controversies involving political bias debates with parallels to disputes surrounding Fox News, RT (TV network), Al Jazeera, and Der Spiegel. Legal issues referenced court actions in venues like the Israeli Supreme Court, labor disputes invoking the Histadrut and employee claims involving contract law litigated in district courts in Tel Aviv District Court and Jerusalem District Court. Investigations by journalists intersected with reporting on figures such as Shaul Elovitch, Aryeh Deri, Ehud Olmert, and corporate inquiries echoing probes into Bezeq and Pelephone.
Digital strategy included a website, mobile applications on Android (operating system), iOS, social media engagement on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and video production for platforms like YouTube and collaborations with broadcasters such as Channel 12 (Israel) and KAN. Multimedia efforts mirrored trends at The New York Times, The Guardian, and BBC News with podcasts, investigative series, and data journalism projects referencing tools used by organizations such as ProPublica, Bellingcat, and academic centers like The Shorenstein Center.
Category:Israeli newspapers