General Walter C. Short

Contents

General Walter C. Short was a United States Army officer who commanded the Hawaiian Department and Schofield Barracks at the time of the Attack on Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941. His tenure and decisions immediately before the attack made him a central figure in subsequent inquiries alongside Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and other senior United States military and United States government leaders. Short's career spanned assignments with the Philippine Department, Panama Canal Zone, and staff posts influenced by doctrines emerging from Fort Leavenworth and the United States Army War College.

Early life and military education

Walter C. Short was born in Fillmore, Ohio, and graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York in the class of 1903, a cohort that included officers who later served in World War I and World War II alongside figures from the United States Army Coast Artillery Corps and United States Army Corps of Engineers. His early training connected him with institutions such as the Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth and the Army War College in Washington, D.C., establishing relationships with contemporaries from Fort Sam Houston, Fort Monroe, and the Presidio of San Francisco. Short’s professional development reflected the interwar emphasis on postings to the Philippine Department and staff work with the War Department General Staff.

Short’s assignments before 1941 included duty with the Coast Artillery Corps and commands in strategic territories like the Panama Canal Zone and the Philippine Islands, where he interacted with commanders associated with the United States Asiatic Fleet, MacArthur's staff, and units tied to Fort Mills and Corregidor. He served in administrative and training roles that put him into contact with senior officers from the Army Ground Forces, Army Air Forces, and the Office of the Chief of Staff (United States Army), as the Neutrality Acts and the expansion of the United States Navy shaped interservice planning. Short’s career trajectory linked him with contemporaries at Fort Benning, Fort Bragg, and commands involved in implementing coastal defense doctrines developed after the Washington Naval Conference.

As commanding general of the Hawaiian Department and commander of Schofield Barracks and the Hawaii Army defense establishment, Short worked alongside Admiral Husband E. Kimmel of the United States Pacific Fleet and with officials from the Territory of Hawaii, Governor Joseph B. Poindexter, and civil defense organizations tied to Honolulu. In the months preceding 7 December 1941 Short received intelligence produced by elements of Military Intelligence Division, liaised with War Department staff, and coordinated with Fort Shafter, Pearl Harbor Naval Base, and Bellows Field airfields. The posture of Hawaiian land defenses, decisions on aircraft dispersal, and the activation of blackout and alert conditions placed Short at the center of debate involving contemporaries from the Office of Naval Intelligence, Army Air Forces, and commanders with experience from the China Burma India Theater and Philippine Campaign (1941–42).

After the attack, Short and Admiral Kimmel were relieved of command and subjected to multiple investigations including a Pearl Harbor Court of Inquiry and reviews by congressional entities such as the Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack. These proceedings considered intelligence from sources like MAGIC and assessed communications between the War Department General Staff, Pacific Fleet, and the Office of Naval Intelligence. Witnesses included senior figures from Frank Knox's Navy Department and staff officers from the Army Air Forces and the Army General Staff, and the inquiries produced contentious evaluations that involved comparisons with other commanders such as Douglas MacArthur and officers who served in the Philippine Islands. The court’s findings affected debates in Congress and among historians including authors associated with the Naval History and Heritage Command and critics referencing Pearl Harbor Papers and contemporary studies.

Following the inquiries, Short returned to reduced-profile assignments before eventual retirement from active duty in 1942 and transfer to the Retired List in 1945; his postwar years involved interactions with veterans’ organizations, commentators from the New York Times and Washington Post, and historians assembling archives at repositories such as the National Archives and Records Administration and the Library of Congress. Short’s contemporaries in retirement included officers who had commanded in Europe and the Pacific Theater, and his case featured in wartime and postwar reviews by figures at the Army Historical Division and the Office of Naval Records and Library.

Short’s legacy is debated in studies by historians associated with institutions like the United States Military Academy, the Naval War College, and universities producing scholarship on the Pearl Harbor attack and United States entry into World War II. Analyses compare Short’s decisions to doctrinal practices at Fort Leavenworth, interservice coordination exemplified by the War Plans Division, and intelligence handling tied to MAGIC decrypts. Later congressional action and executive reviews influenced reassessments of culpability involving figures such as Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, and William D. Leahy, while contemporary historians reference collections at the National World War II Museum and publications from the Naval Institute Press and University Presses. Short appears in debates alongside commanders like Hap Arnold, Chester W. Nimitz, and Ernest King in broader accounts of preparedness, command responsibility, and the complex institutional history of the United States Armed Forces during a pivotal moment in the twentieth century.