European New Car Assessment Programme

European New Car Assessment Programme
source
Name	European New Car Assessment Programme
Formation	1997
Type	Non-profit organisation
Headquarters	Brussels
Location	Europe
Leader title	Director

European New Car Assessment Programme is an independent non-profit organisation established in 1997 to provide consumer information on the safety performance of passenger cars through standardized crash tests and evaluations. It operates across multiple European Union member states and collaborates with automotive regulators, testing laboratories, research institutes and consumer groups to influence vehicle safety standards and public policy. Its activities include laboratory testing, field research, rating publication and engagement with stakeholders such as manufacturers, NGOs and legislative bodies.

History

The programme was launched in the late 1990s following proposals from the Transport Research Laboratory, European Commission, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, International Transport Forum and consumer organisations including Federation of European Consumers' Organisations; early supporters included national safety agencies like the Swedish Transport Administration and the Department for Transport (United Kingdom). Initial development drew on crash test experience from institutions such as Monash University's Monash Institute of Transport Studies, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the German Federal Highway Research Institute. Over subsequent decades, expansions involved partnerships with research centres like the French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Development and Networks, the Austrian Institute for Traffic Safety Research, the Kleber Institute, and testing facilities such as the Vehicle Safety Test Centre, evolving protocols informed by projects financed by the European Research Council and the Horizon 2020 programme. Milestones included adoption of side impact and pedestrian protection assessments influenced by standards from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, the World Health Organization and technical committees of the International Organization for Standardization. High-profile collaborations and critiques involved organisations like Consumers International, the European Transport Safety Council, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, and various automotive manufacturers' associations including the European Automobile Manufacturers Association.

Organisation and Governance

Governance is overseen by a network of national members drawn from organisations such as ADAC, RAC Foundation, ANEC, BEUC, DEKRA, TÜV SÜD, GTÜ, ÖAMTC, KTI, FIA Foundation and research institutes like Chalmers University of Technology and RWTH Aachen University. Operational management interacts with testing laboratories including HORIBA MIRA, Applus+ IDIADA, Polisportiva MTC, UTAC CERAM and CSIRO affiliates; legal and policy advice has been provided by think tanks such as the Centre for European Policy Studies and the Institute for European Environmental Policy. Funding and stakeholder engagement include representatives from the European Parliament's transport committees, national transport ministries like the Ministry of Transport (France), insurance bodies including the Association of British Insurers and research funders such as the European Investment Bank. Advisory panels have featured experts associated with universities including Imperial College London, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, TU Munich, Delft University of Technology and Politecnico di Torino.

Testing Protocols and Methodology

Protocols incorporate crash modalities developed in coordination with standards bodies such as the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and the International Organization for Standardization and draw on experimental techniques from laboratories like Transport Research Laboratory and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Methodology covers frontal impact, side impact, pole tests and whiplash assessments using dummies standardized by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and anthropomorphic test devices from manufacturers like Humanetics. Pedestrian and cyclist protection assessments reference biomechanics research from Karolinska Institutet and University of Bern laboratories. Test instrumentation, data acquisition and sled testing practices parallel work at Fraunhofer Society institutes and Oak Ridge National Laboratory collaborations; computational modelling and virtual testing leverage resources from CERFACS, Simula Research Laboratory and supercomputing centres funded by the European Grid Infrastructure. Validation studies have been published in journals associated with Society of Automotive Engineers and presented at conferences such as International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.

Rating System and Criteria

The programme issues star ratings based on weighted criteria spanning adult occupant protection, child occupant protection, vulnerable road user protection and safety assist technologies, referencing regulatory frameworks like the General Safety Regulation (EU) and UNECE Regulations such as UNECE R129. Scoring incorporates metrics related to airbag performance, seatbelt reminders, autonomous emergency braking systems tested against protocols influenced by the European New Car Assessment Programme's research partners and sensor validation methods studied at Delft University of Technology and RWTH Aachen University. Criteria also evaluate active safety features such as lane support systems and driver monitoring with input from projects funded by Horizon Europe and standards guidance from European Committee for Standardization. Results are published for consumers and cited by policy bodies including the European Commission and NGOs such as Transport & Environment.

Impact on Safety and Regulation

The programme's testing outcomes have influenced regulatory changes initiated by the European Parliament and national legislatures, contributing evidence used by the European Commission in drafting measures under the General Safety Regulation (EU). Its ratings have affected manufacturer design priorities within firms like Volkswagen Group, BMW, Daimler, Stellantis, Renault, Hyundai Motor Group and Toyota Motor Corporation and informed procurement policies of fleets run by organisations such as Deutsche Bahn and municipal authorities in cities like Stockholm, London, Paris and Berlin. Insurance companies including Allianz and AXA have referenced ratings in risk assessments, while consumer bodies like Which? and ADAC use results in advisory material. Collaborative research with institutions such as European Transport Safety Council and International Transport Forum has linked improved star ratings to reductions in injury rates reported by national road safety observatories, and the programme's methodologies have been adopted or adapted by counterparts like Latin NCAP and ASEAN NCAP.

Criticisms and Controversies

Critics from academic groups including researchers at University of Oxford and TU Delft and NGOs like Pro-Test have questioned aspects of protocol transparency, test repeatability and alleged manufacturer tuning to specific assessment procedures; debates involved media outlets such as BBC, Le Monde and Der Spiegel. Controversies have arisen over the pace of incorporating new technologies such as automated driving functions, with input from regulators at UNECE and standards bodies like ISO prompting calls from stakeholders including the European Automobile Manufacturers Association and consumer advocates such as BEUC. Some safety researchers from Monash University and Karolinska Institutet have argued for expanded real-world crash data integration provided by agencies like Eurostat and national police databases, while industry groups have raised concerns about test costs and market impacts discussed in forums convened by ACEA and the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers.

Category:Automotive safety