LLMpediaThe first transparent, open encyclopedia generated by LLMs

BoxRec

Generated by GPT-5-mini
Note: This article was automatically generated by a large language model (LLM) from purely parametric knowledge (no retrieval). It may contain inaccuracies or hallucinations. This encyclopedia is part of a research project currently under review.
Article Genealogy
Parent: Michael Hunter Hop 5
Expansion Funnel Raw 56 → Dedup 0 → NER 0 → Enqueued 0
1. Extracted56
2. After dedup0 (None)
3. After NER0 ()
4. Enqueued0 ()
BoxRec
NameBoxRec
TypeBoxing records database
RegistrationOptional
OwnerPrivate
AuthorJohn Sheppard
Launch date2000
Current statusActive

BoxRec is an online database and record-keeping site that documents professional and amateur boxing match results, boxer profiles, and event histories. It aggregates bout outcomes, rankings, and championship lineage data for fighters from multiple countries and eras, serving as a resource for journalists, promoters, historians, and fans. The site is organized around individual boxer pages, event cards, and searchable bout logs, and it has influenced media coverage, sanctioning body records, and statistical research in boxing.

History

BoxRec was created by John Sheppard in 2000 amid a growing digital interest in sports record-keeping following developments in World Wide Web publishing and online sports encyclopedias. Early contributors included volunteer editors and regional record-keepers with experience in organizations such as the International Boxing Hall of Fame community and local boxing commissions. Over time it expanded coverage through collaborations with journalists from outlets like ESPN, BBC Sport, and The Ring (magazine), and through data aggregation inspired by historical compendia such as works by Maurice Golesworthy and databases used by the International Boxing Research Organization. BoxRec’s growth paralleled changes in boxing governance involving bodies like the World Boxing Association, World Boxing Council, International Boxing Federation, and World Boxing Organization, as recorded in sanctioning announcements and title-lineage disputes. The site’s volunteer and paid staff developed data standards influenced by archival practices from institutions like the British Library and sporting record projects associated with the Statistical Society of Canada.

Database and Coverage

The database catalogs professional and selected amateur bouts across weight classes recognized by organizations such as the Olympic Games boxing competitions and national federations like USA Boxing and England Boxing. Coverage includes fighter biographical data, bout result notation (e.g., unanimous decision, technical knockout), venue histories including arenas like Madison Square Garden and MGM Grand Garden Arena, and sanctioning details referencing titles from the European Boxing Union and regional commissions. Historical depth spans early 20th-century fighters contemporaneous with figures such as Jack Johnson and Joe Louis, through modern boxers whose careers intersect with events like Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs Manny Pacquiao-era reporting. The site cross-references promoters and organizations such as Don King, Bob Arum, and Matchroom Sport for event promotion context. Data provenance is often reconstructed from newspaper archives including those of the New York Times, The Guardian (London), and boxing periodicals like Boxing News (UK).

Website Features and Tools

BoxRec provides searchable boxer profiles, bout search filters, event cards, and statistical summaries used by media platforms like Sky Sports and CBS Sports. Tools include ranking algorithms and database export capabilities that resemble approaches used in sports statistics projects such as those run by Pro-Football-Reference and Basketball-Reference. The site offers user accounts for contributors, editorial controls for data verification akin to practices at institutions like the Smithsonian Institution archives, and APIs or data access tailored to researchers associated with universities such as University of Oxford and University of California, Los Angeles for academic studies. Visualizations include bout timelines and record progression similar to analytical tools employed by the PGA Tour and Major League Baseball data platforms. The platform’s event pages link to venues, judges, and referees, with officials often traceable to national commissions like the Nevada State Athletic Commission.

Notable Uses and Impact

Journalists at outlets including The New York Times, Sports Illustrated, and Yahoo! Sports have cited BoxRec data in reporting on bout outcomes, rankings, and historical comparisons. Promoters and matchmakers associated with entities like Top Rank (company) and Golden Boy Promotions have used the database for opponent research and matchmaking. Academic researchers in sports history and sociology have incorporated BoxRec datasets in studies published through presses such as Oxford University Press and journals connected to institutions like Harvard University. The database has informed title-lineage reconstructions referenced by historians of figures like Muhammad Ali and Sugar Ray Robinson, and it has supported betting markets and odds compilation utilized by operators regulated under jurisdictions such as Gibraltar and Nevada.

Controversies and Criticisms

The site has faced criticism over data completeness, editorial transparency, and ranking methodology, drawing scrutiny from journalists at The Guardian (London), commentators on Sky Sports, and researchers comparing datasets from bodies like the International Boxing Hall of Fame archives. Some national commissions and promoters have disputed entries related to bout dates, result attribution, or recognized title status, leading to public disagreements similar to debates previously seen in sports statistics disputes involving organizations like FIFA and World Athletics. Critics have also pointed to access restrictions on certain data feeds and to the governance model used for volunteer editors, prompting discussion in academic forums at institutions such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Cambridge. Defenders cite BoxRec’s volunteer verification efforts and archival work comparable to projects by the Library of Congress and historical boxing compendia, while ongoing improvements to sourcing and dispute-resolution procedures remain subjects of community and media attention.

Category:Boxing websites