Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha

Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha
Own work · Public domain · source
Name	Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha
Founder	Madan Mohan Malaviya
Founded	1915
Headquarters	Delhi
Ideology	Hindu nationalism

Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha

The Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha was an Indian organization founded in 1915 that played a prominent role in early twentieth‑century Indian National Congress era politics and the broader debates involving Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Lala Lajpat Rai and Madras Presidency leaders. It operated across provinces such as the United Provinces, Punjab, Bombay Presidency, Bengal Presidency, and Madras Presidency, interacting with groups including the Indian National Congress, the All India Muslim League, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the Hindu Mahasabha (United Provinces), and personalities like Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, and Madan Mohan Malaviya. The organization influenced debates in legislative bodies such as the Imperial Legislative Council and the Central Legislative Assembly, and left a contested legacy linking pre‑partition politics, communal tensions, and post‑independence party formations like the Bharatiya Janata Party.

History

The Mahasabha emerged from mobilizations around the Aligarh Movement, Arya Samaj, Bengal Renaissance, and colonial-era reform contests involving figures such as Madan Mohan Malaviya, B. R. Ambedkar, Annie Besant, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, and Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. Early assemblies met alongside events in Amritsar and debated responses to the Rowlatt Act, Jallianwala Bagh massacre, and the Khilafat Movement, while interacting with campaigns led by Maulana Muhammad Ali, Abul Kalam Azad, Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, and Chaudhry Khaliquzzaman. Through the 1920s and 1930s the Mahasabha engaged with provincial politics in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bengal, and Madras, participating in elections to bodies like the Provincial Legislative Council and critiquing policies linked to the Government of India Act 1935 and debates in the Round Table Conferences.

Ideology and Objectives

The organization promoted positions associated with leaders such as Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, advocating a cultural and political vision aligned with traditions exemplified by Manusmriti interpretations, Santiniketan‑era cultural nationalism, and critiques of policies advanced by Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. It advanced objectives related to the protection of Hindu places linked to Ayodhya, Kashi (Varanasi), and Mathura and engaged with legal matters in forums like the Privy Council and provincial courts alongside litigants such as R. K. Shanmukham Chetty and C. Rajagopalachari. The Mahasabha articulated positions on subjects debated by Allama Iqbal, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, and Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, contending with communal electorates, the Separate Electorates issue, and proposals by the Simon Commission.

Organization and Leadership

Leadership included prominent figures associated with universities and movements: Madan Mohan Malaviya in early years, activists like Bhagwan Das, K. B. Hedgewar‑era colleagues, and later leaders who intersected with the careers of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, N. B. Khare, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, and regional actors from Punjab, Bihar, Rajasthan, and Assam. The Mahasabha maintained provincial committees interacting with institutions such as Banaras Hindu University, Aligarh Muslim University, Calcutta University, Princeton University scholars, and legal advisers who engaged parliamentary procedures in the Imperial Legislative Assembly. Its organizational model echoed formations like the Servants of India Society and drew volunteers accustomed to networks similar to the Indian Volunteers Movement.

Political Activities and Alliances

The Mahasabha contested elections to bodies such as the Central Legislative Assembly and provincial councils, negotiated alliances and rivalries with the Indian National Congress, All India Muslim League, and regional parties like the Justice Party (Madras), while sometimes collaborating tactically with leaders such as Shyama Prasad Mukherjee and dissidents from the Congress Socialist Party. It engaged in mobilizations against policies backed by the British Raj, engaged in petitions to the Viceroy of India, and debated constitutional schemes including the Cabinet Mission Plan and the Mountbatten Plan. The organization’s networks intersected with publishing houses in Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras and intellectuals linked to Bengal Renaissance newspapers and periodicals.

Role in Independence Movement and Partition Era

During the independence movement the Mahasabha opposed certain programs led by Mahatma Gandhi and engaged in dialogues with Muhammad Ali Jinnah over communal representation, often taking positions during critical moments such as the Civil Disobedience Movement, Quit India Movement, and the run-up to the Partition of India. Its stance on Partition and related communal conflicts placed it in contention with figures like Sardar Patel, Vallabhbhai Patel, Abdul Ghaffar Khan, and provincial administrations in Punjab and Bengal. The Mahasabha’s activists appeared in debates around refugee flows, princely states such as Hyderabad State, and legislative negotiations in Constituent Assembly of India contexts.

Controversies and Criticism

The organization was criticized by leaders including Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Abul Kalam Azad, B. R. Ambedkar, and Syama Prasad Mookerjee for stances some labeled communal, especially regarding incidents connected with figures like Nathuram Godse and events referenced in discussions about political violence, law prosecutions, and investigations by bodies akin to the Bombay High Court, Allahabad High Court, and commissions established under the Indian Penal Code framework. Scholars comparing Mahasabha positions have cited conflicts with Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh founders, debates in journals associated with Calcutta Review, and critiques from international commentators in outlets tied to The Times of London and The Economist.

Legacy and Influence

The Mahasabha’s influence extended into post‑1947 politics through debates shaping parties such as the Bharatiya Jana Sangh and later the Bharatiya Janata Party, and through legal and cultural campaigns involving institutions like Banaras Hindu University, Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi movement activists, and organizations in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, and Rajasthan. Historians referencing archives in National Archives of India, scholarship by Romila Thapar, Bipan Chandra, Ayesha Jalal, Sumit Sarkar, and comparative studies involving Eric Hobsbawm and C. A. Bayly connect Mahasabha activities to longer trajectories in South Asian political formations, communal politics, and contemporary debates in institutions such as the Supreme Court of India. The organization’s contested heritage continues to appear in political science, legal scholarship, and regional histories involving actors like Atal Bihari Vajpayee, L. K. Advani, George Fernandes, and commentators from Mainstream and Economic and Political Weekly.

Category:Political organisations based in India