Harlem riot of 1935

Harlem riot of 1935
Unknown authorUnknown author · Public domain · source
Title	Harlem riot of 1935
Date	March 19–20, 1935
Location	Harlem, New York City, United States
Type	Race riot
Injuries	125+
Motive	Racial discrimination, economic deprivation, police brutality

Harlem riot of 1935. The Harlem riot of 1935 was a major outbreak of civil disorder in the Harlem neighborhood of New York City on March 19–20, 1935. Sparked by the false rumor that a Puerto Rican teenager had been killed by police after being caught shoplifting, the unrest was fundamentally rooted in decades of institutional racism, severe economic hardship during the Great Depression, and deep-seated community anger over police brutality. Often cited by scholars as the first "modern" race riot in the United States, it shifted the focus from interracial conflict to a rebellion by African Americans against the oppressive conditions of the ghetto and is considered a pivotal, though tragic, event in the long history of the civil rights movement.

Background and causes

The underlying causes of the 1935 riot were the product of systemic failures and racial oppression that had festered in Harlem for generations. The neighborhood, a world-renowned center of African-American culture during the Harlem Renaissance, was simultaneously a densely populated, economically depressed ghetto. The Great Depression had devastated the community, with unemployment rates far exceeding the city average and relief efforts from agencies like the Works Progress Administration being slow and inadequate. Residents faced rampant housing discrimination, exorbitant rents for substandard tenements, and were largely excluded from employment in the white-owned businesses that profited from the community. This economic exploitation was compounded by pervasive police brutality and a near-total lack of political representation. Intellectuals and activists, including figures associated with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the Communist Party USA, had long documented these conditions. A 1935 report by the New York Urban League and a subsequent investigative commission chaired by future mayor Fiorello La Guardia would later confirm that the riot was not a spontaneous crime wave but an explosion of pent-up frustration against institutional racism.

The incident and outbreak

The immediate catalyst occurred on the afternoon of March 19, 1935, at the S. H. Kress five-and-dime store on 125th Street. Lino Rivera, a sixteen-year-old Puerto Rican youth, was caught attempting to steal a penknife. Store managers detained him, but chose not to press charges. To avoid a commotion, they escorted Rivera out through a rear entrance. However, a false rumor spread rapidly through the crowded street that the teenager had been beaten and killed by white police officers in the store's basement. This rumor, fueled by a long history of distrust in the New York City Police Department, acted as a match to the tinderbox of community grievances. Despite attempts by a local community activist and a police lieutenant to calm the crowd by presenting the unharmed Rivera, the angry gathering outside the store refused to believe the official account. The situation escalated when an ambulance arrived for an unrelated medical call, which the mob misinterpreted as confirmation of Rivera's death.

Course of the riot

What began as an angry protest outside the Kress store quickly escalated into a widespread riot that engulfed central Harlem. Mobs began smashing the windows of white-owned stores along 125th Street, Lennox Avenue, and other major thoroughfares, looting goods that many could not afford. The primary targets were not individuals but symbols of economic exploitation: grocery stores, clothing shops, and pawnbrokers. The New York City Police Department mobilized a large force, but was initially overwhelmed. Violence erupted between police and rioters; officers used nightsticks and, according to contemporary accounts from the Amsterdam News, fired shots into crowds. Three men—Lloyd Hobbs, Josey Rogers, and a third unidentified man—were killed by police gunfire. Over 125 people were injured, and more than 100 were arrested. The riot continued through the night and into the next day, only subsiding after a heavy rain and the deployment of additional police units.

Aftermath and casualties

The physical and human toll of the riot was severe. Three African American men were killed, all by police bullets. Estimates of the injured exceeded 125, and property damage was extensive, with hundreds of stores vandalized or looted. The economic damage further crippled the neighborhood's already strained commercial landscape. In the immediate aftermath, city officials and much of the white press, including the New York Times, largely characterized the event as a senseless crime spree. In stark contrast, the black press, such as the Amsterdam News and The Chicago Defender, framed it as a justified rebellion against intolerable conditions. This divergence in narrative highlighted the profound racial divide in understanding urban unrest.

Official response and investigation

Under significant pressure, Mayor Fiorello H. La Guardia took the unprecedented step of appointing a biracial commission to investigate the root causes of the riot. Chaired by the esteemed African American sociologist E. Franklin Frazier and later by future U.S. Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg, the commission included leaders like A. Philip Randolph of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters. Their landmark report, "The Negro in Harlem: A Report on Social and Economic Conditions," rejected the "crime wave" theory. Instead, it concluded that the riot was the inevitable result of "the economic and social injustices" borne by Harlem's residents, citing discrimination, unemployment, police misconduct, and the failure of city services. While the report's recommendations for improved housing, jobs, and community policing were largely ignored by city government, it provided an authoritative, liberal critique of systemic racism that would inform activism for decades.

Significance and riot

The Harlem riot of 1935 holds a seminal place in the history of the civil rights movement and the study of urban unrest. Scholars like Claude McKay and later Kenneth B. Clark identified it as a turning point—the moment when the "race riot" transformed from a violent clash between white and black mobs into a violent protest by a black community against its own oppressive conditions. It demonstrated that the optimism of the Harlem Renaissance had given way to the harsh realities of the Depression and systemic neglect. The riot, and the official report it spawned, provided a blueprint for the social science that would later underpin the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision. The uprising also served as a precursor to the more widespread urban rebellions of the 1960s, from the 1964 Harlem riot to the Watts riots and beyond, establishing a tragic pattern of violence stemming from poverty, racism, and police misconduct. It underscored the urgent need for the broader civil rights movement to address not just economic inequality in the urban North.