LLMpediaThe first transparent, open encyclopedia generated by LLMs

Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft

Generated by GPT-5-mini
Note: This article was automatically generated by a large language model (LLM) from purely parametric knowledge (no retrieval). It may contain inaccuracies or hallucinations. This encyclopedia is part of a research project currently under review.
Article Genealogy
Parent: Wilhelm Leibbrand Hop 5
Expansion Funnel Raw 75 → Dedup 0 → NER 0 → Enqueued 0
1. Extracted75
2. After dedup0 (None)
3. After NER0 ()
4. Enqueued0 ()
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft
TitleZeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft
AbbreviationZStW
DisciplineCriminal law
LanguageGerman
Editorsee Editorial Board and Publication Details
PublisherMohr Siebeck (historically), others
History1887–present
FrequencyQuarterly (historically variable)
CountryGermany

Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft is a longstanding German legal periodical dedicated to criminal law scholarship. Founded in the late 19th century, the journal has served as a forum linking jurisprudential debates from Berlin, Munich, Leipzig, and Göttingen with comparative work engaging London, Paris, Rome, Vienna, and Zurich. Its pages have engaged prominent jurists across Europe and beyond, interacting with debates associated with figures and institutions such as Otto von Bismarck, Friedrich Nietzsche, Max Weber, Hermann Kantorowicz, and Gustav Radbruch.

History

The journal emerged in the context of legal reforms and academic expansion that included the activities of the Reichstag (German Empire), the codification currents surrounding the Strafgesetzbuch (1871), and the scholarly networks of the German Empire universities. Early contributors included scholars linked to Halle (Saale), Breslau, Heidelberg University, and Leipzig University, and debates often referenced jurisprudential controversies involving Immanuel Kant-influenced thinkers and critics influenced by Jeremy Bentham and Cesare Beccaria. Across the Weimar Republic, contributors engaged with the Weimar Republic constitutional discussions and the criminal-law scholarship intersecting with the Reichsgericht and the judicial practice of the Weimar National Assembly. Under the Nazi regime, the journal, like many legal institutions, underwent pressures tied to the Nazi Germany legal reorganization and the politicization of criminal law; notable legal historians and practitioners who remained in academia faced dilemmas comparable to those confronting figures such as Carl Schmitt and Hans Frank. After 1945, the journal participated in reconstruction debates involving the Allied occupation of Germany and the reorientation of penal codes influenced by comparative experiences from United States, United Kingdom, and France jurisprudence. During the Cold War, dialogues contrasted the legal systems of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic, occasionally citing cases from the European Court of Human Rights and discussing concepts resonant with scholars from Oxford University and Harvard Law School.

Scope and Content

The journal covers doctrinal analysis, comparative studies, historical investigations, and interdisciplinary work touching on criminal procedure and substantive penal law. It has published examinations of landmark statutes and cases referencing the Strafprozessordnung (1877), legislative reforms inspired by the European Convention on Human Rights, and doctrinal disputes that refer to opinions emanating from institutions like the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the Bundesgerichtshof, and the Landgericht. Thematic issues often engage with topics such as the development of mens rea doctrines traced to influences including Francis Bacon, the comparative reception of codes like the Napoleonic Code and the Italian Penal Code (Codice Penale), and transnational regulatory questions involving bodies such as the United Nations and the Council of Europe. The journal has also featured contributions on penology, criminal policy, forensic psychology linked to research at institutions like Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and criminological data drawn from agencies such as the Statistisches Bundesamt.

Editorial Board and Publication Details

Historically edited by prominent criminal law scholars based at German universities—professors affiliated with Humboldt University of Berlin, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, University of Freiburg, and Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen—the board has included figures whose work intersects with courts and ministries, such as scholars engaged with the Federal Ministry of Justice (Germany), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and international academic societies like the International Association of Penal Law. Publication frequency has varied; the journal has been produced by established academic presses historically associated with German legal publishing. Submissions undergo peer review typical of scholarly periodicals, and editorial policies reflect standards comparable to those of journals published by academic houses in Leipzig, Stuttgart, and Frankfurt am Main.

Impact and Reception

The journal has exerted substantial influence within German-speaking criminal law scholarship and in comparative law circles across Europe and beyond. Its articles have been cited in opinions from high courts including the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Bundesgerichtshof, and referenced by parliamentary committees in the Bundestag and by ministries considering reform of penal statutes. Internationally, the journal’s engagement with comparative jurisprudence has drawn attention from faculties at Cambridge University, Yale Law School, Sorbonne University, and Università di Bologna, and from scholars associated with networks such as the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law and the Hague Academy of International Law. Reception has ranged from praise for rigorous doctrinal analysis to criticism during periods when legal scholarship was accused of accommodation to political regimes, prompting historiographical assessments from legal historians at institutions like The London School of Economics and Columbia University.

Notable Articles and Contributors

Over its history the journal has published influential articles by jurists and theorists whose work intersects with major legal developments. Contributors have included academics with ties to Göttingen University, Marburg University, Bonn University, and Erlangen-Nuremberg University, as well as comparative scholars from Princeton University and Stanford Law School. Noteworthy pieces addressed doctrinal turning points relating to culpability, the legality principle, and the limits of criminalization, engaging substantive contributions by scholars comparable in stature to Rudolf von Jhering, Franz von Liszt, Eduard von Simson, and Karl Binding. The journal has also hosted debates featuring contemporary authors whose work resonates with international criminal tribunals such as the International Criminal Court and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and with reform initiatives linked to the European Union acquis in criminal law.

Category:German law journals