United Nations Security Council Resolution 678

United Nations Security Council Resolution 678
Izzedine · CC BY-SA 3.0 · source
Title	United Nations Security Council Resolution 678
Number	678
Organ	Security Council
Date	29 November 1990
Meeting	3,027
Code	S/RES/678(1990)
Subject	Iraq-Kuwait
Result	Adopted

United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 was adopted on 29 November 1990 by the United Nations Security Council and authorized Member States to use "all necessary means" to uphold previous United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the invasion and occupation of Kuwait by Iraq following the Gulf crisis. The resolution followed a series of United Nations measures including Resolution 660, Resolution 661 sanctions, and Resolution 665 maritime enforcement, situating the authorization within the framework of the UN Charter and Chapter VII enforcement powers. It became the international legal basis for the multinational coalition military operation commonly called the Gulf War or Operation Desert Storm.

Background

In August 1990, forces of Iraq under President Saddam Hussein invaded and annexed Kuwait, precipitating an international crisis involving regional and global actors such as the Arab League, OPEC, United States, United Kingdom, Soviet Union, France, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Qatar, and Turkey. Earlier UN measures included Resolution 660 demanding immediate withdrawal, Resolution 661 imposing comprehensive sanctions, and Resolution 662 declaring the annexation null and void. Diplomatic efforts involved envoys from US diplomacy, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and mediators such as James Baker and Boutros Boutros-Ghali, while regional negotiations featured the Gulf Cooperation Council, Arab League interventions, and negotiations between Iraqi Armed Forces and Kuwaiti Government-in-exile. The situation affected global energy markets and institutions including International Monetary Fund and World Bank consultations, and heightened tensions among permanent Security Council members—United States, United Kingdom, France, Soviet Union, and China—as well as non-permanent members such as Cuba, Ecuador, and Yemen.

Provisions of the Resolution

Resolution 678 reaffirmed prior resolutions including 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, and 670, and set a deadline of 15 January 1991 for Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait. The text invoked Chapter VII authority and authorized Member States cooperating with Kuwait to use "all necessary means" to restore international peace and security in the area, effectively permitting enforcement actions by a multinational coalition led by CENTCOM with operations such as Operation Desert Shield transitioning to Operation Desert Storm. The resolution preserved the Security Council's responsibility for ceasefire arrangements and prisoner issues, and recognized the role of regional arrangements like the Arab League and Gulf Cooperation Council while directing ongoing sanctions and embargo mechanisms established by previous Security Council measures.

Voting and Diplomatic Reactions

Resolution 678 was adopted with 12 votes in favor, 2 against (Cuba and Yemen), and 1 abstention (Zimbabwe). The vote reflected divisions among Non-Aligned Movement members, permanent Security Council members, and regional actors; it followed intense lobbying by the United States Department of State, United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and diplomats such as James Baker and Margaret Thatcher's government supporters. Opponents cited concerns voiced by Cuban Revolution-era officials, representatives of Yemen aligned with Arab nationalist positions, and critics invoking the precedents of Vietnam War and Soviet–Afghan War for the use of force. Supporters included United States, United Kingdom, France, Soviet Union officials under Mikhail Gorbachev, China's delegation balancing non-interventionist principles, and regional states such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Syria who joined the coalition or backed UN action. International institutions including the International Court of Justice and commentators at International Crisis Group later analyzed the diplomatic dynamics.

Implementation and Military Action

Following the deadline, a multinational force comprising units from United States Armed Forces, United Kingdom Armed Forces, French Armed Forces, Saudi Arabian National Guard, Egyptian Armed Forces, Syrian Armed Forces, Canadian Forces, Australian Defence Force, Italian Armed Forces, Pakistan Armed Forces, and coalition partners launched Operation Desert Storm on 17 January 1991. Air campaigns targeted Iraqi Air Force, Iraqi Republican Guard, and strategic infrastructure, while a ground offensive, Operation Desert Sabre, expelled Iraqi forces from Kuwait City, Al Jahra, Al Ahmadi, and Failaka Island by late February 1991. Naval operations enforced maritime interdiction under 665 and interdicted shipping through Persian Gulf chokepoints near Strait of Hormuz and Shatt al-Arab. The military action culminated in ceasefire terms mediated by UNSC diplomacy, UN Secretary-General envoys including Boutros Boutros-Ghali, and Resolution 687 arrangements.

Legal and Political Impact

Resolution 678’s authorization for use of force under Chapter VII set significant precedents for UN enforcement actions and for doctrines of collective security. Legal scholars compared its language to authorizations in earlier conflicts such as Korean War UN actions and later debates over Kosovo and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. States and jurists debated the scope of "all necessary means" relative to UN Charter Article 42 and the role of regional organizations like the Arab League and Organization of American States. Resolution 678 influenced subsequent Security Council practice on sanctions enforcement, no-fly zone authorizations, and peacekeeping mandates, and became a focal point in international law discussions at institutions such as the International Law Commission and courts including the International Court of Justice.

Aftermath and Legacy

In the immediate aftermath, the coalition liberated Kuwait and imposed Resolution 687 terms including Iraq's disarmament obligations administered by the United Nations Special Commission and IAEA inspections. The long-term legacy included debates over the legitimacy and limits of UN-authorized force, the reconstruction of Iraq under Oil-for-Food Programme negotiations, the rise of regional security arrangements, and political consequences for leaders such as Saddam Hussein. The resolution remains cited in analyses of collective security, humanitarian intervention, and the evolution of United Nations enforcement powers, and figures in the historical narratives of Post–Cold War era diplomacy, the 2003 Iraq War controversies, and scholarship from institutions like Chatham House, Brookings Institution, and the Council on Foreign Relations.

Category:United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Iraq