Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006

Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Sodacan · CC BY-SA 3.0 · source
Name	Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Abbreviation	TUPE 2006
Jurisdiction	United Kingdom
Enacted by	Parliament of the United Kingdom
Introduced by	Secretary of State for Employment
Date enacted	2006
Status	amended

Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 provides statutory protections for employees affected by transfers of businesses and service provision changes in the United Kingdom. The Regulations implement aspects of the European Union Acquired Rights Directive and interact with decisions of the European Court of Justice and the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. It seeks to preserve terms and conditions of employment where undertakings, businesses or services transfer between employers, as reflected in case law such as Süzen v Zehnacker Gebäudereinigung GmbH and Wilson v. United Kingdom.

Background and Purpose

The Regulations originated from the Acquired Rights Directive adopted by the European Economic Community to protect employees' rights on transfers involving entities like the National Health Service trusts and private corporations such as British Airways and Tesco. They respond to precedent from the European Court of Justice in matters including Spijkers v Gebroeders Benedik Abattoir and national rulings by the Employment Appeal Tribunal and Court of Appeal of England and Wales. The purpose is to maintain continuity of employment relationships during corporate events involving parties such as KPMG, Siemens, or Barclays Bank acquisitions.

Scope and Definitions

The Regulations define "transfer" to cover business transfers under principles found in cases like Süzen v Zehnacker Gebäudereinigung GmbH and service provision changes exemplified by contractual arrangements with entities such as Serco Group or Capita. Key definitions reference undertakings, employees, employer, and protected contractual terms, drawing on statutory interpretation similar to that in disputes involving Royal Mail and London Underground. Distinctions between insolvency proceedings under Insolvency Act 1986 and ordinary transfers are guided by jurisprudence from tribunals considering transactions involving firms like Carillion or Deloitte.

Employee Rights and Protections

Employees benefit from transfer of employment contracts, including continuity of service, preserved by principles upheld in cases concerning BUPA and RBS Group. Protections cover pay, benefits, and pension arrangements, with pension cases often litigated in contexts involving Railways Pension Scheme or British Telecom Pension Scheme. Protections also include safeguards against dismissal connected to a transfer, with remedies influenced by decisions involving claimants against employers such as Marks & Spencer and Sainsbury's.

Duties of Employers and Transferees

Transferors and transferees must honour existing contracts and collective arrangements, an obligation shaped by litigation involving employers like Tesco Stores Ltd and Waitrose. They must inform and, where appropriate, consult representatives such as trade unions including the Trades Union Congress and Unite the Union. Obligations to disclose employee liability information can arise in transactions involving advisers like PwC or EY and are often scrutinised in corporate acquisitions involving GlaxoSmithKline or Rolls-Royce.

Collective Agreements and Consultation

Collective agreements negotiated by organisations such as the Trades Union Congress and Unison continue to influence transferred employees, with interaction shown in disputes involving the NHS Confederation and London Borough of Hackney. Consultation duties require informing employee representatives about legal, economic and social implications, reflecting practices in consultations by entities like HSBC and Network Rail. Where collective redundancies are implicated, procedures related to directives from institutions such as the European Commission and rulings from the European Court of Justice govern obligations.

Remedies and Enforcement

Employees can bring claims in forums including the Employment Tribunal and appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal and national courts such as the Court of Appeal of England and Wales or Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. Remedies include re-instatement, compensation for unfair dismissal, and awards for unlawful changes to terms, with precedents established in cases involving employers like British Airways plc and Landmark Group. Enforcement may involve trade unions such as GMB and regulatory scrutiny analogous to some actions by the Equality and Human Rights Commission in employment disputes.

Amendments and Legal Developments

Since 2006 the Regulations have been amended and interpreted in light of decisions from the European Court of Justice and national rulings involving parties like Carillion plc and Northern Rock. Post-Brexit developments, statutory instruments and guidance from the Department for Business and Trade and rulings by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom have further shaped application, especially in complex service provision chains involving contractors such as Interserve and Mitie Group plc. Ongoing academic commentary and case law from institutions like Oxford University and King's College London continue to influence practical operation.

Category:United Kingdom labour law