Generated by GPT-5-mini| The Clash of Fundamentalisms | |
|---|---|
| Name | The Clash of Fundamentalisms |
| Author | Various |
| Subject | Comparative religion and political theology |
| Country | United Kingdom / United States |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Multiple |
| Pub date | 20th–21st century |
The Clash of Fundamentalisms is a comparative study exploring interactions among religious, political, and ideological movements designated as "fundamentalist" across the modern era. It examines tensions involving actors from the United States, Iran, Israel, Saudi Arabia, India and France, situating disputes within episodes such as the Iranian Revolution, the Soviet–Afghan War, the Arab Spring and the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. The work surveys theological currents, organizational networks and state responses while engaging debates from scholars linked to institutions like Harvard University, Oxford University, Princeton University, and Columbia University.
The introduction frames the topic through references to public incidents and texts associated with figures like Ayatollah Khomeini, Pope John Paul II, Jerry Falwell, Ayman al-Zawahiri and Benedict XVI, and institutions such as Al-Azhar University, Yale University, Brookings Institution and Council on Foreign Relations. It situates the phenomenon alongside events like the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the 1978 World Islamic Conference, the 1990s Balkans War and the 2003 invasion of Iraq to immediately connect religious movements with geopolitical crises and transnational networks including Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Likkud, BJP and Christian Coalition.
This section traces antecedents to movements identified with fundamentalist labels through episodes involving Martin Luther, the First Council of Nicaea, the Protestant Reformation, the Wahhabi movement and the Deobandi movement, and through colonial encounters such as those involving the British Empire in India and Egypt under Muhammad Ali of Egypt. It links 19th‑century reactions in contexts like the Second Vatican Council and the Oxford Movement to 20th‑century revivals associated with Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Nation of Islam, and revivalist currents around Reza Shah Pahlavi. The narrative connects intellectuals and texts—Reinhold Niebuhr, Friedrich Nietzsche, Samuel P. Huntington and Hannah Arendt—to policy debates in capitals such as Washington, D.C., London, Tehran and New Delhi.
Key concepts addressed include scriptural literalism as seen in communities influenced by King James Bible movements, juridical restorationism linked to schools such as Shafi‘i school, charismatic authority exemplified by leaders like Ayatollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein, and ethno‑religious nationalism as pursued by parties such as Likud and Bharatiya Janata Party. The text engages doctrinal sources ranging from the Talmud and Mishnah to the Quran and Hadith collections, and their reception in institutions like Yeshiva University and Darul Uloom Deoband. It contrasts formulations from thinkers such as Sayyid Qutb, William F. Buckley Jr., John Rawls, and Carl Schmitt while noting movements tied to organizations including Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hezbollah, Jamaat-e-Islami, American Family Association and Opus Dei.
Case studies examine flashpoints including the Iran–Iraq War, the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the Bosnian War, clashes in Kashmir, the Rwandan Genocide’s religious overtones, and insurgencies in Afghanistan and Iraq. Analyses cover actors from George W. Bush’s administration and Barack Obama’s policies to regional leaders like Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Benjamin Netanyahu, Narendra Modi and Mohammed bin Salman. The section details interactions among groups such as Hamas, Fatah, Taliban, Al-Shabaab and PKK and responses by international organizations like the United Nations, European Union, NATO and African Union.
This part traces cultural effects in media and law through references to events such as the Danish cartoons controversy, the Rushdie affair, the Charter of the French Republic (1905) controversies, and debates over blasphemy statutes in Pakistan and Bangladesh. It surveys political mobilization witnessed in elections involving Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron, Vladimir Putin, and Theresa May, and cultural productions from authors and directors like Salman Rushdie, Orhan Pamuk, Elif Shafak and Ken Loach. Institutional shifts in places such as Supreme Court of the United States, Constitutional Court of Turkey, European Court of Human Rights and universities including Cambridge and Stanford University are examined for their roles in adjudicating claims.
Scholars from Edward Said to Talal Asad, John Esposito, Karen Armstrong and Martha Nussbaum critique reductionist uses of "fundamentalism", arguing that such labels obscure internal diversity and political economy. Debates involve methodological disputes at venues like American Political Science Association and journals such as Foreign Affairs, Journal of Democracy and Comparative Politics, and address tensions between secularist positions exemplified by Laïcité in France and pluralist models advanced by Amartya Sen and Jürgen Habermas.
Prescriptive responses canvassed include interfaith initiatives led by entities like Parliament of the World’s Religions, mediation efforts by Pope Francis and Grand Imam Ahmed el-Tayeb, and peacebuilding programs supported by United Nations Development Programme and World Bank. Legal reforms, educational curricula reforms promoted by UNESCO, and local reconciliation efforts in sites such as South Africa’s post‑apartheid transition and Northern Ireland’s Good Friday Agreement are evaluated alongside counterterrorism strategies developed by FBI, MI6, Interpol and regional security arrangements.
Category:Comparative religion Category:Political theology