Stanford Technology Law Review

Stanford Technology Law Review
source
Title	Stanford Technology Law Review
Discipline	Technology law
Abbreviation	Stanford Technol. Law Rev.
Publisher	Stanford Law School
Country	United States
Frequency	Annual
History	1997–present

Contents

Stanford Technology Law Review is an academic law journal devoted to the intersection of intellectual property and technology policy published by students at Stanford Law School. The journal publishes scholarship addressing patent law, copyright law, trademark law, privacy law, cyberlaw, antitrust law, and regulatory issues implicated by emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, blockchain, and cryptography. Contributors include scholars from institutions such as Harvard Law School, Yale Law School, Columbia Law School, New York University School of Law, and policy researchers from Brookings Institution and Electronic Frontier Foundation.

History

The journal was founded amid a proliferation of technology-focused journals in the late 1990s alongside publications associated with Berkeley Law, UCLA School of Law, MIT, and Oxford University Press initiatives, reflecting debates sparked by cases like A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. and statutes such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Early editorial boards at Stanford Law School included students and faculty connected to centers like the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, and the journal has since shaped discourse parallel to milestones such as Google Books Library Project, the America Invents Act, and rulings from the United States Supreme Court including MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. and Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Over time the journal expanded its remit to address policy interventions by agencies including the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice (United States), and global bodies like the European Commission and the World Intellectual Property Organization.

The review's scope encompasses doctrinal analysis, empirical research, and interdisciplinary work connecting Stanford University faculties such as the Hoover Institution and the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research to debates in Silicon Valley and beyond. Topics often intersect with landmark projects and actors including Google LLC, Apple Inc., Microsoft, Amazon (company), Meta Platforms, Inc., Twitter, Inc., Tesla, Inc., Pfizer, Genentech, University of California, Berkeley, and international frameworks like TRIPS Agreement and General Data Protection Regulation. The journal has featured analyses engaging with technologies and events such as CRISPR, human genome project, autonomous vehicles, Internet of Things, Cambridge Analytica scandal, Snowden leaks, and policy debates around net neutrality.

Managed by student editors from Stanford Law School and affiliated graduate programs, the review follows editorial practices similar to those of general-interest law journals including Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Journal, Columbia Law Review, and specialty journals like Journal of Law and Economics. Submission solicitations invite work from academics at institutions such as University of Chicago Law School, Duke University School of Law, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, Cornell Law School, and from policy researchers at RAND Corporation, Cato Institute, Council on Foreign Relations, and Pew Research Center. The editorial process includes anonymous peer commentary, citation checks referencing cases like KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. and statutes such as the Lanham Act, and collaboration with publishing services used by journals like Oxford University Press and Cambridge University Press for symposium issues dedicated to events such as the Stanford Cyber Policy Center conferences. Special issues have featured contributions from visiting scholars associated with Harvard Kennedy School, Princeton University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and judges from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

The review has published influential articles addressing patent eligibility and software patents in dialogue with cases such as Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International and legislative reforms like the America Invents Act. Articles have analyzed privacy and surveillance in the aftermath of the Edward Snowden disclosures, debated intermediary liability referencing Gonzalez v. Google LLC, and explored platform governance in light of actions by Federal Communications Commission and advisory work linked to National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Contributors have included faculty from Stanford Law School, Georgetown University Law Center, UC Berkeley School of Law, University of Michigan Law School, University of Virginia School of Law, and researchers from entities like Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy & Technology, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. The journal's symposium pieces have engaged policymakers involved in proceedings before the United States Supreme Court, testimony to the United States Congress, and rulemakings at the Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission.

The review is cited in scholarship and policy briefs produced by think tanks such as Brookings Institution, American Enterprise Institute, Bipartisan Policy Center, and advocacy groups including Public Knowledge and Access Now. Its articles have informed litigation strategies in cases heard by courts including the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court, and contributed to discussions at forums like the World Economic Forum, International Telecommunication Union, G20 Digital Ministers Meeting, and national legislative hearings in the United States Congress and the European Parliament. Reception among scholars and practitioners places the review alongside specialty journals like Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, and Yale Journal of Law & Technology for its influence on debates over intellectual property reform, privacy law modernization, and governance of emerging technologies.