This article was accepted into the corpus but its outbound wikilinks were never NER-processed — typical at the deepest BFS hop or when the run's entity cap was reached. No expansion funnel to show.
| Public Records Act (Washington) | |
|---|---|
| Name | Public Records Act (Washington) |
| Enacted by | Washington State Legislature |
| Citation | Revised Code of Washington Chapter 42.56 |
| Enacted | 1973 |
| Amended | various |
| Status | in force |
Public Records Act (Washington) The Public Records Act (Washington) establishes public access to records maintained by agencies of the State of Washington and its subdivisions, balancing transparency with privacy and law enforcement interests. It aligns with principles found in other statutes such as the Freedom of Information Act and interacts with state institutions like the Washington State Supreme Court, Washington State Legislature, and local King County offices. The Act has been central in litigation involving parties including the American Civil Liberties Union, media organizations like the Seattle Times Company, and executive agencies such as the Office of the Governor of Washington.
The Act, codified in Revised Code of Washington Chapter 42.56, was enacted by the Washington State Legislature to provide public access to records of state and local agencies. It functions alongside constitutional provisions in the Constitution of Washington and judicial precedent from cases heard in the Washington Supreme Court and the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. The Act influences the operations of entities such as the Washington State Patrol, Washington State Department of Health, and municipal bodies including the City of Seattle and Spokane County. Enforcement and interpretation have involved litigants and amici like the Public Defender Association, Associated Press, and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
The Act defines "agency" to include state executive departments, boards, commissions, institutions such as University of Washington, counties like Pierce County, cities such as Tacoma, and special districts including school districts and utilities. "Public record" is defined to encompass writings, recordings, maps, photographs, and electronic mail stored by agencies, affecting records in entities like the Washington State Archives and the Department of Licensing. Definitions have been shaped by cases involving the Seattle Police Department, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, and administrative bodies like the Office of Financial Management. Interpretive issues have arisen concerning records held by private contractors performing services for agencies, including firms similar to CGI Group and Accenture in other contexts, and nonprofit partners such as The Nature Conservancy when acting on behalf of public entities.
Requests are submitted to agency records officers or public disclosure units; many agencies follow procedures akin to those used by the Washington State Department of Transportation and municipal clerks in Olympia and Bellevue. Requesters include journalists from outlets like the Seattle Times, researchers affiliated with University of Washington, and litigants represented by firms appearing before the Washington Court of Appeals. Agencies may charge fees comparable to practices at the Washington State Library and must respond within statutory timelines, with appeals routed to the Office of the Attorney General (Washington) or litigated in courts such as the King County Superior Court. Electronic records and metadata issues implicate technologies used by companies like Microsoft and require coordination with information technology offices such as the Washington Technology Solutions.
The Act enumerates specific exemptions, including records related to ongoing investigations by the Washington State Patrol or county sheriffs, privileged materials from the Attorney General of Washington, personal privacy interests invoked by individuals and entities like the Department of Corrections, and proprietary business information submitted by contractors similar to Boeing. Exemptions also interact with statutes such as RCW 42.56.240 for law enforcement and RCW 42.56.420 for certain personnel records. Redactions are common in records from bodies like the Seattle Police Department and the Department of Social and Health Services to protect medical records related to Washington State Hospital patients, juvenile information overseen by Department of Children, Youth, and Families, and deliberative processes used by commissions such as the Public Disclosure Commission (Washington).
Enforcement mechanisms include civil actions in superior courts such as King County Superior Court and remedies like injunctions, declaratory judgments, and attorney fee awards under statutes parallel to those cited in cases involving the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington and media plaintiffs including KOMO-TV. The Washington Attorney General issues opinions and guidance; the Washington Supreme Court has clarified standards for waiver, segregation, and the public interest balancing test. Remedies have been granted against agencies including municipal bodies like the City of Tacoma and state departments, with appeals taken to the Washington Court of Appeals and, in federal questions, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Significant litigation includes decisions by the Washington Supreme Court in cases involving the Seattle Times and the Spokesman-Review, disputes over executive communications in matters involving the Office of the Governor of Washington, and enforcement actions by the ACLU of Washington concerning police records from the Seattle Police Department. Other litigated matters involved King County disclosures, records held by University of Washington researchers, and contractor-held records analogous to disputes seen with corporate defendants such as Amazon (company). Cases often address issues of electronic records involving firms like Google and the admissibility of redactions in courts including the Federal District Court for the Western District of Washington.
The Act has been amended multiple times by the Washington State Legislature, with notable legislative action in sessions that responded to judicial rulings from the Washington Supreme Court and policy debates involving the Governor of Washington. Amendments have clarified definitions, response timelines, fees, and exemptions and have been influenced by advocacy from organizations such as the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and civil liberties groups like the American Civil Liberties Union. Legislative committee hearings in the Washington State Senate and the Washington State House of Representatives have involved testimony from the Washington State Association of Counties, municipal associations like the Association of Washington Cities, and academic commentators from institutions including Seattle University School of Law and University of Washington School of Law.
Category:Washington (state) law