Generated by GPT-5-mini| Pre-Pottery Neolithic A | |
|---|---|
| Name | Pre-Pottery Neolithic A |
| Period | Neolithic |
| Dates | c. 10,000–8,800 BCE |
| Region | Levant, Upper Mesopotamia, Anatolia |
| Major sites | Jericho, Ain Ghazal, Abu Hureyra, Netiv Hagdud |
| Preceding | Natufian |
| Following | Pre-Pottery Neolithic B |
Pre-Pottery Neolithic A Pre-Pottery Neolithic A is an early Neolithic horizon in the Near East associated with monumental sites, nascent agriculture, and novel material practices centered in the Levant and adjacent regions. It marks a formative phase linking Late Pleistocene hunter-gatherer groups such as the Natufian culture with later Neolithic communities encountered at Çatalhöyük, Jericho, and Ain Ghazal. Scholars from institutions like the British Museum, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and universities including University of Cambridge and Hebrew University of Jerusalem have reconstructed its sequence through stratigraphy, radiocarbon dating, and lithic analysis.
The period emerged after climatic amelioration following the Younger Dryas and coincided with developments recorded at sites excavated by teams led by figures such as Kathleen Kenyon, Jiddu Krishnamurti (indirectly via archaeological contexts in the region), and T. E. Lawrence's contemporaries. Excavations by archaeologists like Ruth Tringham, Roger Moorey, and V. Gordon Childe's intellectual legacy shaped comparative frameworks linking PPN A assemblages to sequences at Göbekli Tepe, Tell Abu Hureyra, and Khirbet al-Batrawy. Key laboratories conducting radiocarbon work include the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit and the Weizmann Institute of Science.
Chronology relies on dates from projects by Colin Renfrew-era chronologists and Bayesian analyses by teams at University of Oxford and Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. The phase is commonly framed c. 10,000–8,800 BCE and spans the southern Levant (modern Israel, Palestine, Jordan), parts of Syria, Lebanon, and Upper Mesopotamia in modern Iraq and Turkey. Comparative sequences include contemporaneous horizons at Göbekli Tepe in Şanlıurfa Province and later Neolithic layers at Çatalhöyük in Konya Province.
Major sites with PPN A stratigraphy include Jericho (Tell es-Sultan), Ain Ghazal, Netiv Hagdud, Beidha, and Tell Ramad. Excavations by teams led by Kathleen Kenyon at Jericho and J. N. Postgate-adjacent researchers uncovered radiocarbon-dated adobe and stone architecture featuring circular and rectilinear houses, subfloor burials, and communal installations. Stone-built tower features at Jericho have been discussed in relation to monumental constructions at Göbekli Tepe and communal enclosures at Çatalhöyük.
Subsistence shows early cultivation and management of cereals such as wild einkorn and wild emmer documented by analysts at Weizmann Institute of Science and paleobotanists associated with Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Faunal assemblages recovered by zooarchaeologists from University College London indicate hunting of gazelle, boar, and aurochs in contexts comparable to Abu Hureyra and later domestication trajectories discussed by scholars at University of Cambridge. Archaeobotanical remains, stable isotope studies at Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, and sediment analyses by teams from ETH Zurich converge on a mixed strategy of cultivation, management, and foraging.
Lithic industries include distinctive Naviform and flint blade technologies studied in typologies developed by Franz Sauer and expanded by researchers at British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem. Groundstone tools, mortars, and pestles appear alongside worked bone and antler artifacts found at Ain Ghazal and Beidha. Architectural and craft parallels link PPN A assemblages to ornamental traditions seen later at Çatalhöyük and ritual contexts at Göbekli Tepe. Analysis of bespoke lithic assemblages by teams at Institut für Vorderasiatische Archäologie documents standardized production and exchange networks reaching sites across the southern Levant.
Evidence for social complexity derives from communal structures, plastered skulls, and patterned mortuary treatment recovered by excavators like Kathleen Kenyon and analyzed by cultural anthropologists at Hebrew University of Jerusalem and University of Oxford. Plastered human skulls from sites such as Jericho and Ain Ghazal reflect ancestor veneration comparable to ritual practices argued for at Göbekli Tepe and later at Çatalhöyük. Settlement clustering, intra-site spatial differentiation, and craft specialization have been interpreted in light of models proposed by scholars including Ian Hodder and Colin Renfrew.
PPN A set the stage for the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B sequence and the later Pottery Neolithic communities documented at Çatalhöyük, Ain Ghazal, and regional tells excavated by teams from University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. Transformations in plant and animal domestication, social hierarchy, and craft economies culminated in ceramic adoption and settlement nucleation visible in Neolithic layers at Jericho and Akkar Plain. Interdisciplinary studies by scholars at Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, British Museum, and Université de Paris continue to refine connections between PPN A innovations and the rise of subsequent Near Eastern cultures.
Category:Neolithic cultures of Asia