This article was accepted into the corpus but its outbound wikilinks were never NER-processed — typical at the deepest BFS hop or when the run's entity cap was reached. No expansion funnel to show.
| Longinus (literary critic) | |
|---|---|
| Name | Longinus |
| Birth date | c. 1st–3rd century AD (uncertain) |
| Birth place | Possibly Alexandria, Greece, or Asia Minor |
| Death date | unknown |
| Occupation | Literary critic, rhetorician |
| Notable works | On the Sublime |
Longinus (literary critic) was the name traditionally associated with the author of the treatise On the Sublime, an influential work of literary criticism and rhetoric in the classical tradition. The author long linked to the name Longinus has been associated with Plutarch, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Aristotle, Longinus (philosopher)-style attributions, and later reception in contexts ranging from Dante Alighieri to Edmund Burke. On the Sublime shaped debates in ancient Rome, Byzantium, Renaissance Italy, Enlightenment Europe, and modern literary studies.
The identity of the man conventionally called Longinus has been contested by scholars referencing figures such as Cassius Longinus, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Pliny the Elder, Quintilian, and Porphyry. Hypotheses place him in Alexandria, Athens, Smyrna, or Ephesus, linking him to cultural centers like Hellenistic Alexandria, Imperial Rome, Constantinople, and Pergamon. Debates evoke associations with Stoicism, Platonism, Peripatetic school, Neoplatonism, and rhetorical circles around figures such as Longinus (C. Cassius Longinus), Galen, Aulus Gellius, and Lucian. Manuscript attributions and medieval catalogues introduced confusions involving Dionysius Longinus and Byzantine scholars like Michael Psellos and Nicephorus Gregoras.
The central work attributed to the name is the treatise known as On the Sublime (Greek: Peri Hupsous), which discusses greatness of style and emotional intensity across authors including Homer, Pindar, Sappho, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Thucydides, Herodotus, Plato, Isocrates, Demosthenes, Cicero, Lucretius, Virgil, Horace, Seneca the Elder, and Longus of Lesbos cited comparatively. The treatise surveys examples from Homeric epics, Pindaric odes, Athenian tragedy, Attic oratory, Roman satire, and Hellenistic poetry, analyzing devices such as metaphor, diction, narrative, and invocation. Medieval compilers and Renaissance humanists paired the text with works by Aristotle and Quintilian in curricula for schools in Paris, Padua, Florence, and Oxford.
Scholars have proposed dates ranging from the late 4th century BC over the 1st century AD to the 3rd century AD, with arguments grounded in linguistic analysis, citations by Photius, and manuscript evidence preserved in Byzantine codices alongside texts by Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Longinus (Cassius Longinus). The treatise's transmission involves medieval manuscripts copied in monasteries connected to Mount Athos, Constantinople, and Venice, later printed in early editions by Aldus Manutius and editors in the Renaissance. Key manuscript witnesses include florilegia preserved in libraries of Oxford, Cambridge, Biblioteca Marciana, and Vatican Library. Controversies revolve around whether the author was a single professional rhetorician cited by Galen or a compiler influenced by Aelian and Plutarch.
On the Sublime articulates a theory of aesthetic power emphasizing the role of greatness, strength of emotion, and elevated expression exemplified in the works of Homer, Pindar, and Thucydides. The treatise contrasts sublime effects achieved through invention, emotion, and dignified diction with lesser rhetorical devices favored by Isocrates and technical rules promoted by Aristotle and Quintilian. The author deploys exempla drawn from Greek tragedy, Athenian oratory, Homeric formulae, Lyric poetry, and Roman epic to argue for innate genius and psychological impact as determinants of sublimity, engaging methodological concerns also found in works by Longinus (Cassius Longinus), Hermogenes of Tarsus, and Pseudo-Longinus-era commentators. The text addresses compositional strategies such as metaphor, amplification, narrative pacing, and moral grandeur, intersecting with ethical reflections visible in Stoic and Platonic writings.
In antiquity the treatise circulated among rhetorical and philosophical circles intersecting with Cicero's followers, Seneca's readership, and Byzantine commentators like Photius; during the Middle Ages its influence persisted through glosses in monastic manuscript culture and citations in scholastic settings at University of Paris and University of Bologna. The Renaissance revival brought new life to On the Sublime through humanists such as Giovanni Boccaccio, Poggio Bracciolini, Erasmus, Giambattista Vico, and printers in Venice and Aldine Press editions. In the Enlightenment and Romanticism the treatise shaped debates involving Edmund Burke, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Schiller, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, William Wordsworth, and Percy Bysshe Shelley. Modern aesthetics and literary criticism trace lines to T. S. Eliot, Northrop Frye, Harold Bloom, M. H. Abrams, and scholars in comparative literature and classical philology.
Critical editions and translations emerged from scholars such as Francis Bacon-era commentators, Johann Jakob Reiske, Richard Bentley, August Meineke, Wilhelm Dindorf, Richard Jebb, E. R. Dodds, R. P. Winnington-Ingram, and recent editors working in Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, and Brill. Contemporary debates focus on philological reconstruction, intertextual readings involving Homeric scholarship, reception studies linking to Renaissance humanism, and theoretical reassessments in journals of classical studies, aesthetics, and comparative literature. Ongoing projects in textual criticism utilize manuscript catalogues from Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, British Library, and the Vatican Library alongside digital humanities initiatives at Perseus Project and university consortia to refine readings and translations.
Category:Ancient Greek literary critics Category:Classical literature