Generated by GPT-5-mini| Kadampa | |
|---|---|
| Name | Kadampa |
| Founded | 11th century |
| Founder | Dromtönpa (disciple of Atisha; others linked in text) |
| Founded place | Tibet |
| Scriptures | Buddhist sutras and tantras, commentaries of Atisha, works of Dromtönpa |
| Regions | Tibet, Mongolia, China, Bhutan |
| Languages | Sanskrit, Classical Tibetan |
Kadampa is an 11th-century Tibetan Buddhist movement originating from the teachings of Atisha and institutionalized by his disciple Dromtönpa. It emphasized systematic practice, ethical discipline, and textual study, influencing later Tibetan schools such as Gelug and interfacing with figures like Milarepa and Ngorchen Kunga Zangpo. The movement played a significant role in the Tibetan Renaissance alongside patrons including the Pala Empire and interactions with neighboring polities such as the Kingdom of Bhutan.
The movement arose during the Tibetan thirteenth-century revivals associated with translators like Rinchen Zangpo, patrons such as the Pala Empire rulers Dharmapala, and monastic patrons exemplified by initiatives under Yeshe O and regional rulers of Ngari. Rooted in the arrival of Atisha from Bengal and the founding of monastic curricula by Dromtönpa, it reacted to earlier influences including the transmission work of translators like Vairotsana and debates featuring masters such as Bu-ston Rinchen Drub. The development of structured lojong and lamrim literature paralleled efforts by scholars such as Tsongkhapa and reformist currents later embodied by lineages that interacted with polities like the Mongol Empire and Tibetan dynasties. Internal institutionalization led to the establishment of notable centers amid interactions with figures like Marpa Lotsawa and events including pilgrimages to sites associated with Padmasambhava.
Core teachings synthesized treatises by Atisha, systematic lamrim presentations similar to those later formalized by Tsongkhapa, and lojong aphorisms linked to teachers such as Chekawa Yeshe Dorje. Practices emphasized lojong mind-training, lojong slogans preserved in commentaries by figures like Serlingpa and Langri Tangpa, combined with lojong-influenced meditations found in works used by Milarepa and Gampopa. Ethical vinaya discipline paralleled rules observed at institutions influenced by Shantarakshita and doctrinal study of Madhyamaka texts attributed to Nagarjuna. Supplemental tantric practices incorporated canonical tantras transmitted by translators such as Vasubandhu and translators’ schools linked to Ritual compilations; meditative systems often referenced practices preserved in catalogues compiled by Buton Rinchen Drub.
Organizationally, the tradition led to multiple lines including those whose institutional descendants contributed to the formation of the Gelug school and influenced the Sakya and Kagyu traditions through textual exchange with figures like Gampopa and Marpa. Branches established educational curricula comparable to those later found at monastic universities such as Sera Monastery, Ganden Monastery, and Drepung Monastery, while maintaining links with lineages that interacted with the Phagmodrupa Dynasty and regional polities of Amdo and Kham. Transmission networks connected with international patrons including the Yuan dynasty and later contacts with the Qing dynasty court.
Significant teachers included Atisha (originator of core texts), Dromtönpa (institutionalizer), lojong proponents like Chekawa Yeshe Dorje and contemplatives such as Langri Tangpa. Later influential scholars and reformers who drew on the tradition encompassed Tsongkhapa, Buton Rinchen Drub, and ascetics like Milarepa whose practices reflected cross-lineage fertilization. Patrons and political figures shaping its institutional fortunes included rulers of the Pala Empire, the Yuan dynasty, and Tibetan leaders from the Phagmodrupa Dynasty.
Monastic hubs associated with the movement and its descendants included early centers in central Tibet and transregional institutions that inspired later foundations such as Sera Monastery, Ganden Monastery, and Drepung Monastery. Regional monasteries in Amdo and Kham served as transmission points, while centers in Ladakh, Bhutan, and Mongolia facilitated international dissemination. Libraries and scriptoria preserved commentarial corpora that later appeared in catalogues by scholars like Buton Rinchen Drub and were incorporated into curricula at universities linked to the Gelug and Sakya traditions.
The movement’s lamrim and lojong systems directly informed the scholastic curricula of Tsongkhapa and the institutional frameworks of later schools such as Gelug. Its integration of ethical discipline and systematic study influenced teachers across lineages including Gampopa, and its texts were cited in works by scholars like Buton Rinchen Drub and commentators in the courts of the Yuan dynasty. Cultural transmission extended to Mongolia, China, and the Himalayan kingdoms, shaping liturgical, pedagogical, and contemplative practices that persist in contemporary institutions such as Sera Monastery and modern teachers who trace pedagogical ancestry to the movement.