Generated by GPT-5-mini| Journal of Human Resources | |
|---|---|
| Title | Journal of Human Resources |
| Discipline | Human resources studies |
| Abbreviation | JHR |
| Publisher | University-based press |
| Country | United States |
| Frequency | Quarterly |
| History | 1965–present |
Journal of Human Resources The Journal of Human Resources is a peer-reviewed academic journal publishing research on labor markets, demographic change, public policy, and social programs. Founded in the mid-20th century, the journal has been associated with major universities, scholarly societies, and research institutes, attracting contributors from economics departments, public policy centers, and social science faculties. It serves as a venue for empirical and theoretical work that informs policymakers, academics, and practitioners linked to labor studies and program evaluation.
The journal was established in the 1960s amid debates on social policy and labor reform influenced by figures and institutions such as John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Great Society, and research centers like the National Bureau of Economic Research, Brookings Institution, and Russell Sage Foundation. Early editorial leadership drew on scholars connected to Harvard University, University of Chicago, Columbia University, and Princeton University, reflecting intellectual currents from thinkers associated with Milton Friedman, Paul Samuelson, Gary Becker, and James Heckman. Over decades the journal engaged with major policy episodes including analyses related to the War on Poverty, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and welfare reforms inspired by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. Editorial transitions often coincided with methodological shifts influenced by institutions such as National Science Foundation grants, leading research networks at RAND Corporation and collaborations with IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
The journal's remit covers labor supply and demand, human capital accumulation, wage determination, program evaluation, inequality, migration, and demographic behavior, intersecting with studies from departments at Stanford University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Yale University, University of Michigan, and London School of Economics. It routinely publishes work that employs techniques developed by scholars in venues like Econometrica, American Economic Review, and Quarterly Journal of Economics, including randomized controlled trials pioneered in projects such as those run by Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo, and field experiments linked to Development Economics programs. The editorial focus emphasizes rigorous empirical identification drawn from natural experiments, instrumental variables strategies used in research by Angrist and Krueger, regression discontinuity designs associated with David Card and Joshua Angrist, and structural modeling traditions tied to James Heckman.
Published on a regular quarterly schedule, the journal has been hosted by university presses and scholarly societies, with production involving editorial offices at research universities like University of Wisconsin–Madison and distribution through academic libraries at institutions such as Library of Congress, British Library, and consortia including JSTOR and Project MUSE. Access policies have shifted from subscription models used by publishers like Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press toward hybrid arrangements and open access initiatives influenced by funders including the National Institutes of Health, European Research Council, and philanthropic organizations such as the Gates Foundation. Special issues have been edited in collaboration with centers at Carnegie Mellon University, University of California, Berkeley, and policy units within Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in major bibliographic databases including Social Sciences Citation Index, Scopus, EconLit, ProQuest, and bibliographies curated by libraries at Harvard University and Princeton University. Its metadata are harvested by services run by Clarivate Analytics and incorporated into citation platforms like Google Scholar, RePEc, and indexing initiatives associated with WorldCat and CrossRef.
Scholars have cited the journal in debates on wage inequality informed by work related to Thomas Piketty, labor market analyses connected to David Card and Alan Krueger, and program evaluations referenced in policy reports from United States Department of Labor, United Nations Development Programme, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The journal's articles have contributed to Nobel-recognized literatures associated with laureates such as Angus Deaton and Joseph Stiglitz through empirical measures of welfare and inequality. Reviews in outlets including The Economist, academic blogs hosted by Institute for Fiscal Studies, and citations in policy hearings before bodies like the U.S. Congress attest to its influence.
Notable contributions include empirical studies on minimum wages and employment effects building on debates involving Card and Krueger, analyses of returns to schooling in the tradition of Becker and Mincer, evaluations of job training programs tied to Job Corps research, and randomized evaluations influenced by Banerjee and Duflo. The journal published influential work on migration and remittances referenced in literature by Gordon Hanson and David Card, research on intergenerational mobility linked to studies from Raj Chetty's group, and methodological papers expanding causal inference connected to researchers at National Bureau of Economic Research and labs at MIT and Harvard.
The editorial board has historically comprised economists, demographers, and policy analysts affiliated with universities such as Princeton University, University of Chicago, Columbia University, London School of Economics, and research organizations including IZA Institute of Labor Economics and National Bureau of Economic Research. The peer review process follows double-blind procedures common to journals like American Economic Review and Journal of Political Economy, with editorial decisions guided by referees drawn from networks spanning Stanford University, Yale University, University of California, Berkeley, and international collaborators at University of Toronto and Australian National University.
Category:Academic journals