LLMpediaThe first transparent, open encyclopedia generated by LLMs

Jim Bridger Power Plant

Generated by GPT-5-mini
Note: This article was automatically generated by a large language model (LLM) from purely parametric knowledge (no retrieval). It may contain inaccuracies or hallucinations. This encyclopedia is part of a research project currently under review.
Article Genealogy
Expansion Funnel Raw 74 → Dedup 0 → NER 0 → Enqueued 0
1. Extracted74
2. After dedup0 (None)
3. After NER0 ()
4. Enqueued0 ()
Jim Bridger Power Plant
NameJim Bridger Power Plant
LocationSweetwater County, Wyoming, United States
Coordinates42°20′N 108°54′W
StatusOperational
Commissioning1974–1984
OwnerPacifiCorp (subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy)
Primary fuelCoal
Electrical capacity~2,110 MW
WebsitePacifiCorp

Jim Bridger Power Plant The Jim Bridger Power Plant is a large coal-fired power station located near Point of Rocks, Wyoming in Sweetwater County, Wyoming, United States. Commissioned in stages during the 1970s and 1980s by Pacific Power and Rocky Mountain Power affiliates, the facility has been central to regional electricity supply, coal mining linkages, and debates over air quality regulation, Clean Air Act compliance, and energy transition policy.

Overview

The plant sits on the eastern flank of the Green River Basin near the Green River (Wyoming) and is connected to the Intermountain West transmission network, serving load centers across Wyoming, Idaho, Utah, and Nevada. As a major facility in the Western Interconnection, it interacts with grid operators and institutions such as North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Western Electricity Coordinating Council, and regional balancing authorities. The site is linked by rail and road to coal fields such as the Powder River Basin and to infrastructure projects like the TransWest Express Transmission Project and regional substations including Aeolus Substation.

History and Development

Early planning involved utilities and contractors including PacifiCorp, General Electric, and engineering firms from the Tucson Electric Power era, with financing and regulatory approvals influenced by state bodies like the Wyoming Public Service Commission and federal entities like the Environmental Protection Agency. Unit construction and commissioning took place during the energy expansion period that included contemporaries such as Navajo Generating Station, Colstrip Power Plant, Boardman Coal Plant, and San Juan Generating Station. Over time, policy shifts prompted retrofits influenced by rulings and programs associated with the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, New Source Review, and state-level Air Quality Division (Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality) directives.

Plant Design and Units

The complex comprises four main generating units driven by pulverized coal boilers, steam turbines, and generators from manufacturers that include General Electric and industrial contractors linked to projects like Bechtel installations and Fluor Corporation engineering. Plant auxiliaries include electrostatic precipitators, selective catalytic reduction systems, and flue gas desulfurization considerations that mirror retrofits at other sites such as Navajo Generating Station and Sundance Power Plant. Cooling systems tie into local hydrology and mirror design choices seen at Medicine Bow River adjacent facilities and western thermal plants.

Fuel, Emissions, and Environmental Impact

Fuel historically originated from strip-mined coal in the Powder River Basin, moved by rail operators including Union Pacific Railroad and BNSF Railway, and sourced from mines operated by firms like Peabody Energy, Arch Coal, and regional producers. Emissions profiles have prompted scrutiny over sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, mercury, and carbon dioxide, connecting the plant to national discussions involving Environmental Protection Agency regulations, Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, and Affordable Clean Energy rule debates. Environmental groups such as Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, and Defenders of Wildlife have engaged in litigation and advocacy around impacts on wildlife corridors, Greater sage-grouse, and regional air quality. Mitigation and monitoring efforts relate to programs run by Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, federal Fish and Wildlife Service, and research institutions including University of Wyoming and Colorado State University.

Ownership and Operations

Ownership and operation have been through utility structures including PacifiCorp and its parent Berkshire Hathaway Energy, with corporate governance influenced by boards and executives associated with utilities like Rocky Mountain Power and transactions resembling those in the acquisition histories of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company. Operational oversight interacts with grid operators such as PJM Interconnection comparators, regional reliability entities like Western Electricity Coordinating Council, and market participants who reference wholesale markets in California Independent System Operator and Northwest Power Pool studies. Workforce and labor relations have involved unions and trade groups similar to those represented by International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and contractor relationships with firms like Kiewit.

Economic and Community Impact

The plant has provided tax revenue to Sweetwater County, employment for local communities including Rock Springs, Wyoming and Green River, Wyoming, and economic linkages to suppliers, railroads, and service firms. Its existence influenced regional planning by entities like the Wyoming Business Council and has been considered in broader economic transitions examined by institutions such as the Brookings Institution and U.S. Department of Energy clean energy workforce analyses. Community discussions have referenced educational partnerships with Western Wyoming Community College and health impact assessments comparable to studies by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention affiliates.

Safety, Incidents, and Regulatory Actions

The plant's operational history includes routine safety procedures, compliance inspections by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, and responses to incidents similar to notable events at Mills Coal-fired Plant and other western facilities. Regulatory actions have involved consent agreements, emissions control timelines informed by Clean Air Act litigation, and settlement dialogues with advocacy organizations including Sierra Club and regional stakeholders. Emergency preparedness coordinates with county emergency management offices and federal guidance from agencies like Federal Emergency Management Agency and Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Category:Coal-fired power stations in Wyoming