International Commission on Large Dams

International Commission on Large Dams
Global Ref · CC BY-SA 3.0 · source
Name	International Commission on Large Dams
Abbr	ICOLD
Formation	1928
Type	Non-governmental organization
Headquarters	Paris
Region served	Worldwide
Membership	National committees

International Commission on Large Dams is a non-governmental organization founded in 1928 that brings together national committees concerned with dam engineering and safety. Established to facilitate exchange among practitioners from France, United Kingdom, United States, Germany, and other countries, it has influenced policy and practice across projects such as the Hoover Dam, Three Gorges Dam, Aswan High Dam, Itaipu Dam, and Barrage de la Rance. The commission interfaces with institutions like the World Bank, United Nations Environment Programme, International Hydropower Association, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, and regional bodies involved in water resources and infrastructure.

History

The commission was created at a meeting that followed international interest in large hydraulic works exemplified by the Aswan Low Dam, the Barrage de la Grande Dixence, and early twentieth‑century schemes in Spain and Italy, with founding members drawn from Belgium, Canada, Chile, Denmark, and Egypt. During the interwar period the body exchanged knowledge relevant to projects such as Hoover Dam and later coordinated practices influenced by events like the Vajont Dam disaster, the reconstruction efforts after World War II, and post‑war development agendas tied to the Marshall Plan and initiatives by the United Nations Development Programme. The Cold War era saw engagement with engineers from the Soviet Union, China, India, and Brazil as hydropower projects including Itaipu Dam and Bhakra Dam expanded. In the late twentieth and early twenty‑first centuries the commission addressed matters raised by controversies around Three Gorges Dam, transboundary disputes such as those on the Mekong River, and climate‑related resilience discussed at United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change meetings.

Organization and Governance

The commission's governance model features an International Board and an elected President drawn from professional communities in countries including France, Japan, Switzerland, Norway, and Australia. Its statutes define responsibilities for Standing Committees and technical Working Groups that coordinate with entities like the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, the International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research, and standards bodies in Germany and United Kingdom. Decision‑making procedures mirror those used by other international NGOs such as International Federation of Consulting Engineers and the International Water Association, with by‑laws adopted during General Assemblies held in cities like Paris, Tokyo, Lisbon, and Istanbul.

Membership and National Committees

Membership is organized through national committees representing countries such as United States, China, India, Brazil, South Africa, Egypt, Turkey, Russia, and Canada. National committees liaise with ministries and agencies such as the United States Bureau of Reclamation, China Three Gorges Corporation, Central Water Commission (India), National Water Commission (Brazil), and utilities like Électricité de France. Associate members include academic institutions such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Imperial College London, École des Ponts ParisTech, Tsinghua University, and consultancies active on projects like Glen Canyon Dam and Kariba Dam.

Activities and Programs

The commission runs technical Working Groups, task forces, and collaborative programs addressing dam design, safety, environmental mitigation, and socio‑economic assessment in contexts like river basins of the Amazon River, Nile River, Mekong River, and Yangtze River. It provides guidance for risk assessment influenced by case studies such as the Banqiao Dam failure, landslide‑reservoir interactions observed at Vajont, and reservoir induced seismicity noted near Koyna Dam. The commission partners with multilateral lenders such as the World Bank, African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the European Investment Bank on best practice integration, and contributes expertise to legal and policy frameworks developed in forums like the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Ramsar Convention.

Publications and Standards

ICOLD issues bulletins, technical reports, and guidelines on topics including spillway design, concrete dam behavior, embankment dams, instrumentation, and emergency preparedness, complementing standards from organizations such as American Society of Civil Engineers, British Standards Institution, Deutsches Institut für Normung, and International Organization for Standardization. Its watchlists and recommendations have informed national codes used in projects like Guri Dam and Kopanina Dam and influenced academic texts authored at Stanford University, ETH Zurich, and University of Tokyo. Periodic compilations capture lessons from failures and innovations that resonate with literature on hydrology, geotechnical engineering, and seismic design published by presses tied to Cambridge University Press and Springer.

Conferences and Training

The commission organizes World Congresses and regional symposia held in cities such as Beijing, Montreal, Prague, New Delhi, and Santiago, attracting delegates from agencies including United States Army Corps of Engineers, Water Resources Council (India), National Water Research Institute (Canada), and corporations like ABB and General Electric. Training initiatives and workshops are conducted in partnership with universities and professional societies including Institution of Civil Engineers, American Concrete Institute, and Engineering Institute of Canada, and sometimes coordinated with donor programs by the United Nations Development Programme and Food and Agriculture Organization.

Impact and Criticism

The commission has substantially influenced dam engineering practice, safety culture, and international cooperation, shaping outcomes for projects such as Itaipu Dam, Aswan High Dam, and Three Gorges Dam, and informing lenders like the World Bank and Asian Development Bank. Criticism has focused on perceived alignment with large infrastructure interests amid concerns raised by advocacy groups involved with World Commission on Dams, indigenous rights organizations associated with cases on the Narmada River, and environmental NGOs active around the Amazon rainforest and Mekong River Commission. Debates continue over trade‑offs highlighted in disputes like those involving the Tarbela Dam and social impacts documented in reports from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

Category:Hydrology Category:Civil engineering organizations