LLMpediaThe first transparent, open encyclopedia generated by LLMs

Highland Wind Farm

Note: This article was automatically generated by a large language model (LLM) from purely parametric knowledge (no retrieval). It may contain inaccuracies or hallucinations. This encyclopedia is part of a research project currently under review.
Article Genealogy
Parent: Green Mountain Power Hop 5 terminal

This article was accepted into the corpus but its outbound wikilinks were never NER-processed — typical at the deepest BFS hop or when the run's entity cap was reached. No expansion funnel to show.

Highland Wind Farm
NameHighland Wind Farm
CountryUnited States
StateUtah
StatusOperational
Commissioned2010s
OwnerPacifiCorp
OperatorPacifiCorp
Turbines69
Capacity mw200
Rotor diameter m100
Hub height m80

Highland Wind Farm is a utility-scale wind energy project in Utah associated with regional renewable energy expansion. The facility contributes to grid-scale generation, supports energy policy targets, and interacts with state infrastructure networks. Its development involved multinational manufacturers, regional utilities, federal land management, and local stakeholders.

Overview

Highland Wind Farm is a wind-power installation sited in the Intermountain West that connects to the Western Interconnection transmission network and participates in wholesale markets administered by entities such as North American Electric Reliability Corporation, California Independent System Operator, Western Electricity Coordinating Council, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, and PJM Interconnection through regional balancing arrangements. The project was developed in the context of state-level renewable portfolio standards influenced by legislation including the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and regulatory frameworks shaped by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Bureau of Land Management. Major manufacturers such as General Electric, Vestas, Siemens Gamesa, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and Nordex have been prominent in supplying turbines across comparable facilities, while original equipment financing involved institutions like Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley.

History and development

Planning for Highland Wind Farm drew on precedents including the development timelines of Altamont Pass Wind Farm, Roscoe Wind Farm, Shepherds Flat Wind Farm, and Alta Wind Energy Center. The project passed permitting processes involving the Utah State Legislature, the National Environmental Policy Act, and consultations with agencies such as the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Developers negotiated easements with private landowners and agencies such as the Bureau of Reclamation and coordinated interconnection studies with Western Area Power Administration and regional transmission organizations. Construction contracts referenced best practices from American Wind Energy Association guidance and procurement patterns mirrored transactions seen in projects with partners like NextEra Energy Resources and Iberdrola Renewables.

Location and site characteristics

The site occupies ridge and plateau terrain in the northeastern part of the state, within proximity to municipalities and counties governed by entities such as the Utah County, Duchesne County, and nearby metropolitan areas like Salt Lake City and Provo. Local topography aligns with corridors used by previous projects in regions near the Wasatch Range and Uinta Mountains. The site selection considered migratory routes monitored by organizations such as the Audubon Society, Sierra Club, and researchers affiliated with University of Utah, Utah State University, and Brigham Young University. Environmental assessments referenced data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and mapping by the United States Geological Survey.

Design and infrastructure

Turbine layouts, access roads, electrical collection systems, and substations were designed in line with engineering standards from bodies like the American Society of Civil Engineers, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and American National Standards Institute. The wind farm includes blade and nacelle components comparable to models used by GE Renewable Energy, Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Siemens Energy, and MingYang Smart Energy in other North American projects. Civil works incorporated grading, culverts, and drainage following guidance from the Federal Highway Administration for access route design. Grid interconnection involved substation equipment compliant with National Electrical Code and coordination with PacifiCorp transmission planners.

Operations and performance

Operational oversight integrates SCADA systems, predictive maintenance practices, and performance analytics similar to programs used by Enel Green Power, EDF Renewables, Pattern Energy, Brookfield Renewable Partners, and Ørsted for asset management. Performance metrics—capacity factor, availability, and curtailment—are evaluated against regional wind datasets produced by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and modeled using tools referenced in academic work from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University. Operations have involved stakeholder coordination with grid operators like BPA and entities such as the Northwest Power and Conservation Council for system reliability planning.

Environmental and community impact

Environmental reviews addressed impacts to avian species monitored by Audubon Society, The Nature Conservancy, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and considered mitigation measures consistent with guidance from Bureau of Land Management and Environmental Protection Agency. Community engagement included consultations with county commissions, local chambers such as the Salt Lake Chamber, landowner associations, and tribal governments including the Ute Indian Tribe and others with cultural resource concerns handled in coordination with the National Park Service and State Historic Preservation Office. Economic and social effects were assessed using models developed by researchers at University of Colorado Boulder, University of California, Berkeley, and the Brookings Institution.

Ownership and economics

Ownership and contract structures reflected utility-scale norms with an owner-operator model managed by PacifiCorp and financing sourced through tax-equity, debt, and power purchase agreements. Commercial arrangements were influenced by counterparties such as Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services, and Tesla in the broader market for corporate renewable procurement, and by capacity markets overseen by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Economic assessments considered incentives like the federal production tax credit established in legislation including the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and financing mechanisms employed by firms such as Macquarie Group and Allianz Global Investors.

Category:Wind farms in Utah