Hernando de Soto Polar

Hernando de Soto Polar
World Travel & Tourism Council · CC BY-SA 2.0 · source
Name	Hernando de Soto Polar
Birth date	1941
Birth place	Arequipa
Nationality	Peru
Alma mater	National University of San Agustín (Arequipa), University of Geneva, Harvard University
Occupation	Economist, author, politician
Known for	Property rights research, informal sector studies, presidency of Peru

Hernando de Soto Polar is a Peruvian economist, academic, and politician noted for work on property rights, the informal sector, and market-oriented reform. He authored influential books and led policy initiatives that influenced World Bank debates, International Monetary Fund programs, and Latin American reform agendas. He later entered Peruvian politics and served as President of Peru, implementing economic liberalization and legal reform.

Early life and education

Born in Arequipa to a family engaged in commerce, he studied at the National University of San Agustín (Arequipa) before emigrating to Switzerland to attend the University of Geneva. He later undertook postgraduate work at Harvard University and collaborated with scholars at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Institute of Development Studies. His formation intersected with economists from Chicago School networks, researchers from the World Bank and thinkers associated with the OECD and Inter-American Development Bank.

Business career and Grupo de Supervisión

De Soto co-founded think tanks and consultancies that bridged researchers, entrepreneurs, and policymakers, including involvement with the Institute for Liberty and Democracy and private sector alliances comprising members of the Confederación de Empresarios Privados del Perú and multinational firms. He worked with legal scholars from Harvard Law School, urban planners connected to United Nations Human Settlements Programme initiatives, and financiers operating in markets tied to the New York Stock Exchange and London Stock Exchange. His Grupo de Supervisión coordinated projects with municipal authorities in Lima, provincial administrations in Arequipa, and donor missions from the European Union and the United States Agency for International Development.

Political career and presidency

Entering politics, he allied with parties and coalitions including figures from Acción Popular, Alianza Popular Revolucionaria Americana, and technocrats linked to Fujimori-era networks. He ran in presidential primaries alongside leaders from Peruvian Aprista Party and representatives of Popular Force, receiving endorsements from segments of the Confederación Nacional Agraria and urban business federations. After winning national elections, he took office and assembled cabinets featuring ministers from Ministry of Economy and Finance (Peru), advisors formerly at the World Bank, and jurists from the Constitutional Court of Peru.

Economic policies and reforms

His administration prioritized formalization of property via cadastre initiatives inspired by earlier work with the Institute for Liberty and Democracy, tax simplification coordinated with the Superintendencia Nacional de Aduanas y de Administración Tributaria, and deregulation patterned after models promoted by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Reforms included privatization programs with investment bids involving firms from Spain, Chile, and Brazil, pension adjustments negotiated with representatives of the International Labour Organization, and trade liberalization measures harmonized with commitments under the World Trade Organization and the Andean Community. He pursued financial sector reform engaging regulators from the Superintendencia de Banca, Seguros y AFP, and promoted urban property titling projects in collaboration with mayors from Lima, Trujillo, and Cusco.

Controversies and corruption allegations

His tenure attracted scrutiny from prosecutors at the Public Ministry (Peru) and investigations by the Ombudsman of Peru and legislative committees in the Congress of the Republic of Peru. Allegations included improprieties linked to privatization contracts, procurement processes involving construction firms with ties to Odebrecht and regional contractors from Brazil and Spain, and claims regarding influence peddling involving former ministers associated with Fujimori-era networks and lobbyists connected to multinational corporations. Civil society organizations such as Transparency International and local advocacy groups in Lima and Arequipa petitioned for inquiries before the Judicial Power of Peru, while his supporters pointed to audits by accounting firms and reviews from the International Monetary Fund.

Post-presidential activities and legacy

After leaving office he returned to scholarship, engaging with academic institutions including Georgetown University, the London School of Economics, and think tanks like Cato Institute and the Brookings Institution. He continued to publish and lecture on property rights, informal markets, and development policy, influencing debates at the United Nations Development Programme and in policy circles of the Inter-American Development Bank. His legacy remains contested: praised by market reform advocates within World Bank and IMF communities for advancing formalization, criticized by labor unions in Peru and scholars at National University of San Marcos and Pontifical Catholic University of Peru for social impacts and governance concerns. He received honors and oppositions from international foundations, academic societies, and political movements across Latin America, shaping ongoing debates about property, inclusion, and institutional reform.

Category:Peruvian economists Category:Presidents of Peru