Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men

Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men
The original uploader was Polmars at French Wikipedia. · Public domain · source
Title	Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men
Author	Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Original title	Discourse sur l'origine et les fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes
Country	Republic of Geneva
Language	French
Published	1755
Genre	Political philosophy, Enlightenment

Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men is a 1755 philosophical treatise by Jean-Jacques Rousseau addressing the moral and political roots of social inequality. Written during the Enlightenment, it entered intellectual debates alongside works by John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Denis Diderot and influenced later actors such as Maximilien Robespierre, Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill, and Immanuel Kant. The Discourse triggered responses across Europe from figures like David Hume, Edward Gibbon, Giambattista Vico, and institutions including the Académie de Dijon and salons frequented by Madame de Pompadour and Marie Antoinette.

Background and Context

Rousseau composed the Discourse for a prize competition of the Académie de Dijon, joining a field that included essays by Étienne Bonnot de Condillac and debates in journals such as Encyclopédie edited by Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert. The work reflects tensions among proponents of Deism, critics like Voltaire, and natural law theorists including Samuel Pufendorf and Hugo Grotius. Contemporary patrons and critics ranged from Louis XV's court circles to republican intellectuals in Paris and Geneva, and the treatise circulated amid pamphlets linked to the Seven Years' War and diplomatic exchanges involving the Kingdom of Prussia, Habsburg Monarchy, and Kingdom of Great Britain.

Summary and Structure of the Argument

Rousseau frames the Discourse with a methodological contrast between the hypothetical State of Nature and established civil institutions, engaging thinkers such as Thucydides, Aristotle, Plato, Cicero, and moderns like Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. He divides the argument into historical-philosophical sections that trace anthropological conjecture, moral psychology, and institutional consequences, citing examples from histories by Tacitus, Livy, Edward Gibbon, and ethnographies by Jean de Léry and Samuel Hearne. The structure juxtaposes descriptive narrative, normative claim, and polemic directed at contemporaries like Voltaire and Denis Diderot as well as legal theorists such as Jean Bodin and Montesquieu.

State of Nature and Development of Society

Rousseau proposes a hypothetical pre-social condition influenced by proto-anthropologists like Montesquieu and natural historians including Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon, drawing comparative examples from accounts by James Cook, Alexander von Humboldt, Samuel de Champlain, and reports on indigenous peoples like Tecumseh, Pocahontas, and societies encountered in New France and Spanish Empire explorations. He contrasts primitive self-sufficiency with later developments such as private property, agriculture, metallurgy, and urbanization described in chronicles by Herodotus and travelers like Ibn Battuta and Marco Polo. Rousseau's narrative engages with legal precedents in Roman Republic law, feudal arrangements tied to Charlemagne, and civic transformations leading to structures exemplified by Venice and Athens.

Sources and Types of Inequality

Rousseau distinguishes between natural inequality, grounded in age, health, strength, and mental faculties referenced by physicians like Hippocrates and anatomists such as Andreas Vesalius, and moral or political inequality introduced through property relations, laws, and custom—debated by jurists like Hugo Grotius, Samuel Pufendorf, and John Locke. He traces the genesis of moral inequality to the institution of private property associated with figures and events including William the Conqueror, enclosure movements tied to English agrarian change, and legal codifications like the Code Napoléon’s later antecedents. Rousseau contrasts these with communal practices in places studied by travelers such as Lewis and Clark Expedition accounts and ethnographies compiled by Franz Boas’s successors.

Critiques, Reception, and Influence

The Discourse provoked direct criticism from contemporaries including Voltaire, David Hume, and Edward Gibbon and elicited defenses by proponents of natural rights like John Locke’s followers and later reactions from Edmund Burke. Its arguments informed radical politics leading to actors and events such as French Revolution, National Convention, Thermidorian Reaction, and personalities like Maximilien Robespierre, Georges Danton, and Napoleon Bonaparte. Intellectual descendants include Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Alexis de Tocqueville, John Stuart Mill, and modern theorists such as Michel Foucault and Jürgen Habermas who engaged Rousseauian themes in discussions alongside institutions like Sorbonne University and journals such as The Spectator and Le Monde.

Legacy and Modern Interpretations

Scholars in fields represented by Harvard University, University of Oxford, Collège de France, and University of Chicago continue to debate Rousseau’s claims, with commentators including Isaiah Berlin, Charles Taylor, Alasdair MacIntyre, Will Kymlicka, Gordon S. Wood, and Maurice Cranston. The Discourse remains central in curricula alongside works by Plato, Aristotle, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Karl Marx and informs contemporary policy and theory debates involving bodies like the United Nations and courts shaped by precedents from Magna Carta to Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Its impact is visible in cultural treatments ranging from performances at the Comédie-Française to historiography produced by Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press.

Category:Works by Jean-Jacques Rousseau Category:Political philosophy books