This article was accepted into the corpus but its outbound wikilinks were never NER-processed — typical at the deepest BFS hop or when the run's entity cap was reached. No expansion funnel to show.
| Delivering Security in a Changing World | |
|---|---|
| Name | Delivering Security in a Changing World |
| Author | International Security Consortium |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Language | English |
| Subject | Security studies |
| Publisher | Strategic Studies Press |
| Release date | 2024 |
Delivering Security in a Changing World presents an integrated examination of how contemporary NATO members, United Nations, European Union, African Union, and regional actors adapt to rapid shifts in threats and capabilities. The work synthesizes lessons from historical episodes such as the Cold War, the Gulf War, the War in Afghanistan (2001–2021), and responses to crises like the 2011 Libyan Civil War and the COVID-19 pandemic, while engaging institutions including the World Health Organization, Interpol, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund.
This section situates North Atlantic Treaty Organization strategy within debates originating from texts like The National Security Strategy (United States) and doctrines produced by the Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom), referencing thinkers associated with Clauswitz, Sun Tzu, Hannah Arendt, and analysts from RAND Corporation, Chatham House, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. It contrasts lessons from the Korean War, the Falklands War, and the Iraq War with norms embedded in the Geneva Conventions and rulings from the International Court of Justice.
Analysis draws on episodes including the Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation, the South China Sea arbitration, and the Iran–Iraq War to map shifts toward hybrid threats seen in Cyberattack on Estonia (2007), the Sony Pictures hack, and influences traced to actors like Russian Armed Forces, People's Liberation Army (China), Hezbollah, and ISIS. It examines transnational risks exemplified by the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami, the Hurricane Katrina (2005), and pandemic governance highlighted by SARS and H1N1 influenza. Discussion integrates perspectives from European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, US Cyber Command, and research from Brookings Institution and International Committee of the Red Cross.
Frameworks reference doctrine developed at NATO Summit in Washington, D.C. (1999), concepts from the Bucharest Summit (2008), and policy instruments such as the Responsibility to Protect, the Paris Agreement, and the Sustainable Development Goals. It reviews procurement and planning models used by the Ministry of Defence (India), Department of Defense (United States), Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, and standards from ISO bodies, while assessing legal contours shaped by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and decisions by the International Criminal Court.
This section traces innovation paths from technologies showcased at DARPA to commercial developments by Microsoft, Google, Amazon (company), and defense firms including Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, and Thales Group. It assesses disruptive effects of artificial intelligence research from OpenAI and DeepMind, quantum initiatives like IBM Quantum and Google Quantum AI, autonomy projects involving Boston Dynamics and Kongsberg Gruppen, and cyber tools linked to Stuxnet, while referencing encryption standards from NIST.
Comparative governance examines practices in United States Department of Homeland Security, Ministry of Defence (France), Federal Security Service (Russia), and multilateral mechanisms such as the G7, G20, ASEAN, and Arab League. It considers treaty-making exemplified by the Non-Proliferation Treaty, arms control instances like New START, and diplomacy from actors including United States Department of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (China), and negotiators in the Iran nuclear deal framework.
Operational themes draw on training regimens from Sandhurst, West Point, NATO Defence College, and law enforcement practices at FBI Academy and Europol. Logistics and sustainment reference ports like Port of Rotterdam and bases such as Ramstein Air Base, while capacity development cites programs run by United Nations Development Programme, USAID, Japanese International Cooperation Agency, and European Investment Bank.
Case studies include stabilization efforts in Bosnia and Herzegovina, reconstruction in Iraq, counterinsurgency in Mali, maritime security against piracy off Somalia, and resilience building after Hurricane Maria (2017) in Puerto Rico. Sector analyses address critical infrastructure at sites like Hoover Dam, energy security involving Nord Stream 1, and supply chain resilience tracing firms such as Maersk, with health security scenarios referencing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and vaccine distribution models by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
The concluding section forecasts implications for alliances including Five Eyes, anticipates normative debates involving International Law Commission and Human Rights Watch, and advises policymakers in institutions like the World Economic Forum and OECD. Recommendations emphasize interoperable standards from IEEE, investments in research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University, and multilateral capacity-building modeled on initiatives by Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation and the African Development Bank.