This article was accepted into the corpus but its outbound wikilinks were never NER-processed — typical at the deepest BFS hop or when the run's entity cap was reached. No expansion funnel to show.
| Cocincina | |
|---|---|
| Name | Cocincina |
| Regnum | Plantae |
| Unranked divisio | Angiosperms |
| Unranked classis | Eudicots |
| Unranked ordo | Rosids |
| Ordo | Fabales |
| Familia | Fabaceae |
| Genus | Cocincina |
Cocincina is a genus of flowering plants in the family Fabaceae historically cited in taxonomic literature and floristic treatments. First circumscribed in classical botanical works, the genus has appeared in regional checklists and herbarium catalogues alongside taxa described by authorities active in the 18th–20th centuries. Cocincina populations have been referenced in floras and monographs concerning Southeast Asian, Malesian, and Pacific island floristics.
The generic name Cocincina was established in the context of linnaean and post-linnaean taxonomic practice and has been treated in revisions by botanists associated with institutions such as the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, the Smithsonian Institution, and the New York Botanical Garden. Nomenclatural decisions affecting Cocincina have been cited alongside matters discussed in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, and in works by authorities connected to the Linnean Society of London, the Botanical Society of America, and the American Society of Plant Taxonomists. Historical protologues and types were compared with specimens in herbaria such as the Herbier du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (P), the Kew Herbarium (K), the US National Herbarium (US), and the Natural History Museum, London (BM). Synonymy, lectotypification, and reclassification debates have referenced names and treatments appearing in publications from the Flora Malesiana, the Flora of China, the Flora of Thailand, and regional catalogues produced by authors affiliated with the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh and the National Herbarium of the Netherlands (L)]. Botanists involved in these discussions include curators and taxonomists linked to the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, the Royal Ontario Museum, the Australian National Herbarium, and universities such as Harvard University Herbaria, University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, University of California, Berkeley, and University of Tokyo.
Species assigned to Cocincina are described in morphological terms used across comparative studies and monographs alongside genera such as Acacia, Mimosa, Senna, Cassia, and Pterocarpus. Diagnostic characters recorded in field guides and floras include features of the indumentum, leaflet arrangement, stipule morphology, inflorescence architecture, and legume structure, with comparisons drawn to taxa treated in keys by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and authors publishing in journals like Taxon, Kew Bulletin, Brittonia, and Journal of Systematics and Evolution. Morphological descriptions reference traits examined using equipment and facilities at institutions including the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, and university herbaria such as Kew, BM, and US. Comparative anatomy and palynology have been discussed in the context of papers appearing in American Journal of Botany, Annals of Botany, and Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, often alongside examples from genera like Dalbergia, Erythrina, Cajanus, and Phaseolus.
Occurrence records and specimen data for Cocincina have been incorporated into regional flora projects including Flora Malesiana, the Flora of China, the Flora of Thailand, and island checklists for regions such as Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Sulawesi, New Guinea, and the Philippines. Herbarium-based distribution maps produced by institutions like Kew, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh indicate presence in lowland to montane forest zones, often recorded in association with plant communities documented in studies of Dipterocarpaceae-dominated forests, Montane rain forests, and secondary successional stands referenced in conservation assessments by the IUCN. Field surveys led by researchers affiliated with Conservation International, the World Wildlife Fund, and regional universities such as Universitas Indonesia and University of the Philippines have reported specimens from protected areas including parks and reserves managed by authorities equivalent to national agencies and transnational conservation programs.
Ecological observations of Cocincina in floristic inventories and ecological studies note interactions with faunal assemblages recorded in works concerning Asian rainforest pollinators and frugivores. Pollination syndromes and seed dispersal mechanisms have been inferred through comparisons to co-occurring Fabaceae members studied in ecological journals like Ecology Letters, Journal of Ecology, and Biotropica, with attention to mutualists documented by teams from institutions including the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, the National University of Singapore, and James Cook University. Phenological records compiled in herbaria and citizen-science initiatives parallel datasets maintained by platforms linked to institutions such as Global Biodiversity Information Facility and the Botanic Gardens Conservation International. Studies of regeneration and seedling recruitment reference restoration projects undertaken by organizations such as The Nature Conservancy and national forestry services in countries across Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
Assessments involving Cocincina have been conducted within the frameworks used by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, national red lists compiled by ministries analogous to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (Indonesia) and conservation agencies in Southeast Asia, and in reports by NGOs such as Conservation International and the World Wildlife Fund. Threats cited in regional assessments include habitat loss from land-use change documented in studies published by teams at United Nations Environment Programme, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and research groups at universities like University of Oxford and Yale University. Conservation actions recommended in recovery plans and protected area management strategies reference guidance produced by multilateral bodies such as the Convention on Biological Diversity and national park authorities, and have been implemented in projects supported by donors and foundations including the MacArthur Foundation and the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation.