Generated by GPT-5-mini| COP23 | |
|---|---|
| Name | COP23 |
| Date | 6–17 November 2017 |
| Location | Bonn, Germany (hosted by Fiji) |
| Venue | World Conference Center Bonn |
| Organized by | United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; presidency by Fiji |
| Participants | Parties to the Paris Agreement and observers |
| Previous | 2016 United Nations Climate Change Conference |
| Next | 2018 United Nations Climate Change Conference |
COP23 The 23rd session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 13th session of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol convened in Bonn, Germany, with the presidency held by Fiji; the meeting occurred against the backdrop of deliberations surrounding the Paris Agreement implementation. Delegates from United States, China, India, European Union, Brazil and other Parties, alongside representatives from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Bank, Green Climate Fund, and civil society groups, negotiated rules and machinations intended to operationalize the 2015 accord.
The conference followed the withdrawal announcement by the United States presidential transition of 2016–2017 administration from the Paris Agreement and occurred shortly after ratification steps by European Union members and China towards enhanced Nationally Determined Contributions. Fiji’s presidency invoked visibility for Small Island Developing States, Pacific Islands Forum, Alliance of Small Island States and Least Developed Countries Fund interests, drawing attention from United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres and agencies such as United Nations Environment Programme and United Nations Development Programme. Host logistics engaged the Federal Republic of Germany institutions including Bundesregierung agencies and the City of Bonn.
Primary objectives included finalizing the rulebook for implementation of the Paris Agreement—notably the Paris Rulebook elements on transparency, accounting, and market mechanisms—while advancing work under the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement. Delegates debated modalities for Nationally Determined Contributions, the operationalization of the Transparency Framework, and mechanisms referenced in Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, engaging negotiators from African Group of Negotiators, Umbrella Group, Like-Minded Developing Countries, and Group of 77. Technical work involved experts from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, International Civil Aviation Organization, and International Maritime Organization on emissions reporting, while finance discussions included Green Climate Fund, Global Environment Facility, and representatives of Multilateral Development Banks such as the World Bank and Asian Development Bank.
Negotiators produced a set of decisions that advanced guidelines for the Transparency Framework and initiated work towards rules for Article 6 market and non-market mechanisms, though without fully resolving accounting details. Parties adopted a series of conclusions on adaptation finance, loss and damage referencing the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage, and advanced procedural arrangements for the Talanoa Dialogue to assess collective progress. The conference endorsed enhanced reporting templates and timelines for Nationally Determined Contributions submission and encouraged scaling of climate finance through institutions like the Green Climate Fund and bilateral initiatives led by Germany and United Kingdom donors.
Delegations included heads of state and government ministers from Fiji (presidency), Germany (host), and envoys from United States, China, India, Brazil, Japan, South Africa, and Australia, alongside delegations from regional organizations such as the European Union and Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Notable figures included Frank Bainimarama representing Fiji, representatives from Sierra Club, 350.org, and former officials from United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change secretariat; delegations involved negotiators from Small Island Developing States, Least Developed Countries, and Organisation for Economic Co‑operation and Development members. Observers from International Renewable Energy Agency, Greenpeace International, World Wildlife Fund, and indigenous groups participated in plenary and contact groups.
The conference hosted side events and pavilions by entities such as Fiji, Germany, European Commission, United States Agency for International Development, Green Climate Fund, Rocky Mountain Institute, and C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. Initiatives showcased included commitments on renewable deployment by International Renewable Energy Agency, urban resilience programming by United Nations Human Settlements Programme, private finance mobilization by Climate Bonds Initiative, and technical exhibits from Fraunhofer Society and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit. Civil society and academic panels featured contributions from Columbia University, Oxford University, University of Oxford Climate Research Unit, and Yale School of the Environment.
Critics highlighted shortcomings in the conference outcomes on Article 6 market rules and alleged insufficient ambition on Nationally Determined Contributions; commentary emerged from think tanks such as World Resources Institute, Chatham House, and Center for Global Development. The visibility of the United States delegation—contrasting with subnational actors from California, New York (state), and Hawaii—provoked debate involving Mayors National Climate Action Agenda and networks like We Are Still In. Concerns were raised by advocacy groups including Friends of the Earth, 350.org, and Sierra Club about corporate pavilion sponsorships and fossil fuel presence highlighted by protests near the World Conference Center Bonn and statements from indigenous representatives affiliated with Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. Decisions on loss and damage finance and transparency mechanisms attracted scrutiny from the Alliance of Small Island States and African Group negotiators for perceived delays and loopholes.
Category:United Nations climate change conferences