Assembly of First Nations

Contents

Assembly of First Nations The Assembly of First Nations is a national advocacy organization representing a large number of First Nations in Canada, serving as a collective voice for chiefs and communities in relations with the Canadian Crown, Parliament of Canada, and provincial and territorial institutions. It engages with treaties such as the Treaty of Niagara (1764), legal developments including the Constitution Act, 1982 and decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada like R v Gladue and Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia. The organization participates in national forums alongside bodies such as the Métis National Council, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, and provincial chiefs' organizations.

History

The institution emerged from earlier regional gatherings including the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs and the National Indian Brotherhood, founded in response to the 1969 White Paper and recommendations of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Early national assemblies drew leaders linked to figures like George Manuel and Phil Fontaine, and intersected with events such as the Oka Crisis and the passage of the Indian Act reforms. The 1980s constitutional negotiations around the Constitution Act, 1982 and the adoption of Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 shaped its role; later court rulings including Delgamuukw v British Columbia and R v Marshall influenced its legal advocacy. The organization has been part of major national initiatives such as the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada and responses to federal legislation including bills like Bill C-31 (1985) and Bill C-92.

The body comprises elected chiefs from member First Nations in Canada organized into regional caucuses corresponding to entities like the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador, the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs, the Union of Ontario Indians, and the Nishnawbe Aski Nation. Leadership centers on an elected National Chief and a chiefs-in-assembly forum; committees cover areas tied to institutions such as the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, the Canadian Constitution, and the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Governance documents reference precedents from bodies like the Treaty of Versailles only by analogy in deliberative practice; the organization interacts administratively with the Privy Council Office and federal departments including Indigenous Services Canada and Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada.

The organization's functions include national policy advocacy before the House of Commons of Canada and the Senate of Canada, legal interventions in cases before the Supreme Court of Canada, and participation in international fora such as the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and engagement with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. It coordinates research with institutions like the National Research Council (Canada) and academic partners at universities such as the University of British Columbia, the University of Toronto, and the University of Ottawa. The organization also facilitates treaty negotiations, land claims processes tied to judgments such as Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia, and collaborative initiatives with bodies like the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Office of the Auditor General of Canada.

Relations include formal and informal interactions with federal entities like Indigenous Services Canada, Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, and the Privy Council Office, as well as provincial ministries across jurisdictions including Ontario Ministry of Indigenous Affairs and the British Columbia Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation. The organization negotiates and disputes policy with provincial counterparts such as the Government of Alberta and the Government of Quebec, and engages in tripartite tables involving institutions like the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation and the Public Health Agency of Canada on matters including health crises and housing. It has pursued litigation strategies before the Federal Court of Canada and engaged in intergovernmental accords akin to those involving the Council of the Federation.

The organization has advanced positions on implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, child welfare reforms following the Jordan's Principle precedent and decisions like A.C. v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), environmental stewardship in contexts such as disputes over projects like Trans Mountain Pipeline and Site C dam, and economic development initiatives engaging agencies like the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. It advocates funding models influenced by reports from the Office of the Auditor General of Canada and calls for legislative changes including amendments akin to Bill C-92 and federal budget allocations debated in the Budget of Canada.

Membership consists of chiefs elected by their respective First Nations in Canada; regional caucuses include organizations such as the Yukon First Nations, the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (in complementary forums), and provincial assemblies like the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations. Notable national leaders have included figures associated with Phil Fontaine, Ovide Mercredi, and Cindy Blackstock in advocacy roles, and electoral contests have drawn candidates linked to regional leaders from the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs and the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs. Leadership interacts with parliamentary committees including the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs.

Critiques have arisen over representational scope vis-à-vis organizations such as the Métis National Council and grassroots movements like the Idle No More movement, budgetary transparency examined by auditors and civil society groups including the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, and internal disputes reported in conjunction with provincial chiefs' organizations. Controversies have involved legal disputes over funding and governance with federal agencies like Indigenous Services Canada and litigation touching on fiduciary duties highlighted in cases before the Federal Court of Canada and the Supreme Court of Canada. Debates persist regarding the balance between national advocacy and community-level sovereignty claims rooted in historic agreements like the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement and litigated through decisions such as Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests).