Generated by DeepSeek V3.2| Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act | |
|---|---|
| Shorttitle | Tariff Act of 1930 |
| Longtitle | An Act To provide revenue, to regulate commerce with foreign countries, to encourage the industries of the United States, to protect American labor, and for other purposes. |
| Enacted by | the 71st United States Congress |
| Effective date | June 17, 1930 |
| Cite public law | Pub. L. 71–361 |
| Cite statutes at large | 46, 590 |
| Introducedin | House |
| Introducedby | Willis C. Hawley (R–Oregon) |
| Committees | House Ways and Means |
| Passedbody1 | House |
| Passeddate1 | May 28, 1929 |
| Passedvote1 | 264–147 |
| Passedbody2 | Senate |
| Passeddate2 | March 24, 1930 |
| Passedvote2 | 44–42 |
| Passedbody3 | House |
| Passeddate3 | June 13, 1930 |
| Passedvote3 | 222–153 |
| Passedbody4 | Senate |
| Passeddate4 | June 13, 1930 |
| Passedvote4 | 53–31 |
| Signedpresident | Herbert Hoover |
| Signeddate | June 17, 1930 |
Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was a landmark piece of protectionist legislation signed into law by President Herbert Hoover in June 1930. It raised U.S. tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to historically high levels, with the stated goal of shielding American farmers and manufacturers from foreign competition during the onset of the Great Depression. The act is widely criticized by economists and historians for exacerbating the global economic downturn, triggering international trade wars, and contributing to a collapse in world commerce.
The push for higher tariffs began in the agricultural sector, which was suffering from a post-World War I depression and falling commodity prices. In 1929, Representative Willis C. Hawley of the House Ways and Means Committee introduced a bill to aid farmers. The legislation was subsequently taken up in the Senate by Senator Reed Smoot, who expanded it dramatically to include protections for a vast array of manufacturing industries. The bill faced significant opposition, including a public petition from over 1,000 economists urging Herbert Hoover to veto it. Despite this, and after intense lobbying from special interests and lengthy debate in Congress, the act passed along largely partisan lines and was signed by Hoover on June 17, 1930.
The act increased duties on a massive scale, covering agricultural products like wool, sugar, and dairy, as well as manufactured goods including textiles, ceramics, and chemicals. Tariff rates on dutiable imports soared to an average of nearly 60%, among the highest in American history. Specific rates were often prohibitive; for instance, duties on certain agricultural imports exceeded 100%. The legislation also expanded the American selling price system and granted the Tariff Commission greater authority, though its primary effect was a steep across-the-board hike that made thousands of foreign products significantly more expensive for American consumers and businesses.
The immediate economic impact was a sharp decline in international trade. U.S. imports fell from $4.4 billion in 1929 to $1.5 billion by 1933, while exports plummeted even more dramatically, from $5.2 billion to $1.7 billion. This collapse in trade deepened the Great Depression by crippling global agricultural and industrial markets. American farmers, whom the act was ostensibly designed to help, were particularly harmed as other nations retaliated, destroying their export markets. The policy contributed to bank failures, deflation, and a rise in unemployment, worsening the economic crisis both within the United States and worldwide.
The international reaction was swift and severe. Key trading partners viewed the act as an economic declaration of war. Canada imposed new tariffs on a range of American goods and strengthened trade ties with the British Empire. France and Italy introduced quota systems. Britain abandoned its traditional free trade stance, adopting the Imperial Preference system at the Ottawa Conference. Other nations, including Germany, Spain, and Australia, enacted their own retaliatory tariffs and import restrictions. This cycle of protectionism fragmented the global economy into competing blocs and effectively strangled world trade during the early 1930s.
The act is almost universally condemned as a catastrophic policy error. It served as a prime lesson in the dangers of protectionism and became a key rationale for the pursuit of freer trade after World War II, influencing the creation of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and later the World Trade Organization. Modern economists, from Milton Friedman to Paul Krugman, cite it as a textbook example of how trade wars can deepen economic misery. The political fallout contributed to the landslide victory of Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Party in the 1932 election, and subsequent trade legislation, like the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act, sought to reverse its effects.
Category:1930 in American law Category:United States federal trade legislation Category:Protectionism in the United States Category:Great Depression in the United States