LLMpediaThe first transparent, open encyclopedia generated by LLMs

Second Revenue Act of 1940

Generated by DeepSeek V3.2
Note: This article was automatically generated by a large language model (LLM) from purely parametric knowledge (no retrieval). It may contain inaccuracies or hallucinations. This encyclopedia is part of a research project currently under review.
Article Genealogy
Expansion Funnel Raw 45 → Dedup 0 → NER 0 → Enqueued 0
1. Extracted45
2. After dedup0 (None)
3. After NER0 ()
4. Enqueued0 ()
Second Revenue Act of 1940
ShorttitleSecond Revenue Act of 1940
OthershorttitlesRevenue Act of 1940
Enacted by76th
Effective dateOctober 8, 1940
Cite public law76-801
IntroducedinHouse
IntroducedbillH.R. 10413
IntroducedbyRobert L. Doughton (D–NC)
IntroduceddateJune 3, 1940
CommitteesHouse Ways and Means
Passedbody1House
Passeddate1June 6, 1940
Passedvote1373–6
Passedbody2Senate
Passeddate2June 10, 1940
Passedvote260–1
SignedpresidentFranklin D. Roosevelt
SigneddateOctober 8, 1940

Second Revenue Act of 1940 was a major piece of United States tax legislation enacted in response to the escalating national defense needs as World War II intensified in Europe. Signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on October 8, 1940, it represented the second significant tax increase of the year, following the First Revenue Act of 1940. The act dramatically increased federal revenue through higher income tax rates, a new excess profits tax, and expanded excise taxes, marking a pivotal shift toward a mass-based income tax system to fund the nation's preparedness efforts.

Background and legislative history

The urgent need for the legislation arose from the rapid deterioration of the international situation following the Battle of France and the evacuation of Dunkirk, which signaled a potential Axis victory in Europe. With the War Department and Navy Department requesting massive appropriations for rearmament under the Two-Ocean Navy Act, the Congress faced a projected budget deficit of over $3 billion. The House Ways and Means Committee, chaired by Robert L. Doughton, drafted the bill (H.R. 10413) with the goal of raising approximately $1 billion in new annual revenue. The bill moved with exceptional speed through the House and Senate in June 1940, passing with overwhelming bipartisan majorities, though its signing by Roosevelt was delayed until October to avoid impacting the 1940 presidential election.

Key provisions and tax changes

The act introduced sweeping changes to the federal tax code. For individuals, it lowered personal income tax exemptions, effectively drawing millions of new taxpayers into the system, and raised normal tax rates and surtax rates across all brackets. A landmark provision was the introduction of a corporate excess profits tax, initially set at 25% on profits exceeding an 8% return on capital, aimed at curbing war profiteering. The legislation also significantly expanded excise taxes on a wide range of goods and services, including telephones, telegraphs, and various transportation fuels. Furthermore, it increased rates for estate taxes and gift taxes, while making technical adjustments to the capital gains tax structure.

Economic and fiscal impact

Fiscally, the act was successful in its primary aim, increasing federal receipts by nearly $900 million in its first full year and helping to finance the initial phase of the Lend-Lease program and domestic mobilization. Economically, it began the process of cooling an overheated economy and curbing potential inflation by siphoning off excess consumer purchasing power. The expansion of the income tax base, lowering the number of taxable individuals from 7 million to nearly 15 million, fundamentally transformed the Bureau of Internal Revenue and established the fiscal foundation for the far greater revenue demands of the subsequent war years. The excess profits tax, while controversial, set a precedent for similar taxes in the 1941 and 1942 revenue acts.

Political context and reception

The act passed in a charged political atmosphere dominated by the debate between isolationism and interventionism, and amidst Roosevelt's unprecedented campaign for a third term. While supported by key Republican leaders like Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg in the spirit of national unity, it faced criticism from fiscal conservatives who feared excessive deficit spending and from business groups like the National Association of Manufacturers who opposed the excess profits tax as punitive. The American Federation of Labor expressed concern over the burden of excise taxes on workers. Roosevelt's delayed signing was a calculated political move to avoid giving his opponent, Wendell Willkie, a potent issue on the campaign trail regarding tax increases.

Legacy and subsequent legislation

The Second Revenue Act of 1940 is historically significant as the critical bridge between pre-war tax policy and the full wartime tax regime. It established the administrative and conceptual framework for the massive, broad-based taxation required to win World War II. Its excess profits tax model was refined in the Revenue Act of 1941 and the Revenue Act of 1942, the latter of which created the modern system of mass income tax withholding. The act's success in raising revenue without crippling the economy demonstrated the federal government's capacity to use tax policy for large-scale economic mobilization, a lesson applied throughout the Cold War and influencing later revenue acts during the Korean War and the Vietnam War.

Category:1940 in American law Category:United States federal taxation legislation Category:1940 in economics