Generated by DeepSeek V3.2| Revenue Act of 1913 | |
|---|---|
| Shorttitle | Revenue Act of 1913 |
| Othertitles | Underwood Tariff Act, Tariff Act of 1913 |
| Enacted by | 63rd |
| Effective date | October 3, 1913 |
| Public law | [https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/63rd-congress/session-1/c63s1ch16.pdf Pub.L. 63–16] |
| Statutes at large | 38, 114 |
| Acts amended | Payne–Aldrich Tariff Act |
| Title amended | Tariff in United States history |
| Sections created | 26, 1 et seq. |
| Introducedin | House |
| Introducedby | Rep. Oscar Underwood (D) |
| Committees | House Ways and Means |
| Passedbody1 | House |
| Passeddate1 | May 8, 1913 |
| Passedvote1 | 281–139 |
| Passedbody2 | Senate |
| Passeddate2 | September 9, 1913 |
| Passedvote2 | 44–37 |
| Agreedbody3 | House |
| Agreeddate3 | September 30, 1913 |
| Agreedvote3 | 254–103 |
| Signedpresident | Woodrow Wilson |
| Signeddate | October 3, 1913 |
Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Underwood Tariff Act, was a landmark piece of federal legislation signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson on October 3, 1913. It fundamentally reoriented United States fiscal policy by significantly reducing tariff rates and, most consequentially, implementing the first permanent federal income tax following the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The act, championed by Democratic leaders like Oscar Underwood and Cordell Hull, aimed to reform the protectionist system epitomized by the Payne–Aldrich Tariff Act and address federal revenue shortfalls. Its passage marked a decisive shift in American economic history, establishing the income tax as a central pillar of the modern federal revenue system.
The push for the Revenue Act of 1913 was rooted in decades of political debate over the protective tariff system, which was favored by the Republican Party but criticized by Democrats and Progressives as regressive and beneficial to industrial trusts. The election of 1912, which saw Woodrow Wilson win the presidency and Democrats gain control of both chambers of the Congress, provided a clear mandate for tariff reform. Key legislative work was conducted by the House Ways and Means Committee under Chairman Oscar Underwood. The ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in February 1913 cleared the constitutional path for a federal income tax without apportionment among the states, a hurdle that had previously led to the overturning of an income tax in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.. The bill faced significant opposition from Old Guard Republicans and protectionist interests but was passed with strong Democratic majorities.
The act contained two major sets of provisions. First, it substantially reduced tariff rates on hundreds of imported goods, moving the United States toward a more free trade orientation and aiming to lower consumer prices. Second, and most historically significant, it established the modern federal income tax. This tax imposed a 1% levy on net personal incomes above $3,000 ($4,000 for married couples), which exempted the vast majority of American households. A graduated surtax was applied to higher incomes, ranging from an additional 1% on incomes over $20,000 to a top rate of 6% on incomes exceeding $500,000. The act also created the Bureau of Internal Revenue (predecessor to the Internal Revenue Service) to administer the new tax and included a corporate tax of 1% on net corporate profits.
The Revenue Act of 1913 irrevocably transformed the federal government's revenue structure. Prior to its enactment, the federal government relied overwhelmingly on excise taxes and tariffs for funding, as seen during the Civil War and the War of 1812. The new income tax, though initially affecting only a small fraction of citizens, provided a flexible and progressive revenue source that would grow exponentially. This shift reduced dependence on regressive consumption taxes and tariffs, aligning federal revenue more closely with the ability to pay. The administrative framework established by the act, including the creation of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, laid the groundwork for the vast modern tax collection system.
Economically, the tariff reductions led to increased imports and heightened competition for domestic industries, though the overall impact was moderated by the outbreak of World War I. The income tax provisions initially generated modest revenue but established a critical precedent. Politically, the act was a major victory for President Woodrow Wilson and the Democratic Party, fulfilling a key platform pledge. It also embodied the principles of the Progressive Era, advocating for tax fairness and using the tax system to address inequality. The act drew fierce criticism from conservative Republicans and business interests like the National Association of Manufacturers, who argued it would harm the economy and represented federal overreach.
The Revenue Act of 1913 was just the beginning of the federal income tax. It was quickly superseded and its rates dramatically increased by the Revenue Act of 1916 and subsequent wartime acts like the Revenue Act of 1917 and Revenue Act of 1918 to fund World War I. The basic structure it created, however, endured. Its legacy is profound, as the income tax became the primary means of funding the federal government, enabling the expansion of the modern state through the New Deal, World War II, and the Great Society. The act is historically viewed as the foundational statute for the current Internal Revenue Code and a pivotal moment in the history of American public finance.
Category:United States federal taxation legislation Category:1913 in American law Category:Woodrow Wilson