LLMpediaThe first transparent, open encyclopedia generated by LLMs

Mastaba 16 at Meidum

Generated by DeepSeek V3.2
Note: This article was automatically generated by a large language model (LLM) from purely parametric knowledge (no retrieval). It may contain inaccuracies or hallucinations. This encyclopedia is part of a research project currently under review.
Article Genealogy
Parent: Nefermaat Hop 4
Expansion Funnel Raw 26 → Dedup 0 → NER 0 → Enqueued 0
1. Extracted26
2. After dedup0 (None)
3. After NER0 ()
4. Enqueued0 ()
Mastaba 16 at Meidum
NameMastaba 16
LocationMeidum
RegionLower Egypt
TypeMastaba
Part ofMeidum necropolis
BuilderAttributed to Sneferu
MaterialLimestone, mudbrick
BuiltFourth Dynasty
EpochsOld Kingdom
ConditionRuined
ManagementSupreme Council of Antiquities

Mastaba 16 at Meidum is a significant Old Kingdom tomb structure located within the extensive necropolis surrounding the Meidum pyramid. It is one of the largest and most important non-royal tombs at the site, closely associated with the reign of Sneferu, the founder of the Fourth Dynasty of Egypt. The mastaba provides critical evidence for the development of elite tomb architecture and funerary practices during the formative period of the Pyramid Age.

Discovery and Excavation

The mastaba was first systematically examined by the British archaeologist Flinders Petrie during his work at Meidum in the late 19th century. Later, more detailed excavations were conducted by the Egyptian Antiquities Service under the direction of Ali el-Khouli in the 1970s. These investigations revealed the tomb's complex internal structure and helped clarify its relationship to the nearby Meidum pyramid complex. The work by George Andrew Reisner and the Harvard University-Museum of Fine Arts, Boston Expedition also contributed to the broader understanding of the Meidum cemetery's chronology.

Architectural Description

Mastaba 16 is a large, rectangular superstructure constructed with a core of mudbrick and an outer casing of fine limestone. Its design follows the classic mastaba form, with a flat top and sloping sides. The interior contains a complex arrangement of cult chapels and offering chambers, accessible via a north-facing entrance. A deep, vertical burial shaft descends from the superstructure to a subterranean burial chamber lined with limestone blocks. The architectural sophistication, including a serdab (statue chamber), indicates it was built for a very high-ranking official.

Dating and Attribution

Based on its location, construction style, and associated finds, Mastaba 16 is firmly dated to the early Fourth Dynasty of Egypt, specifically the reign of Sneferu. Its proximity to the king's own Meidum pyramid suggests it belonged to a member of the royal family or a top-tier court official. Stylistic comparisons with other elite tombs at Dahshur and Giza further support this early Old Kingdom of Egypt date. The tomb's grandeur implies the owner held a pivotal role in the state administration or the construction projects of Sneferu.

Significance and Interpretation

The tomb is a key monument for understanding the evolution of private tomb architecture at the dawn of the Pyramid Age. It demonstrates a transitional phase between earlier, simpler mastabas and the more elaborate, multi-roomed chapels seen later at Giza. Its location within the shadow of the Meidum pyramid underscores the direct relationship between the royal mortuary complex and the tombs of the elite, reflecting the centralized power of the early Fourth Dynasty of Egypt state. The design elements presage features that would become standard in the noble tombs of the later Old Kingdom of Egypt.

Associated Finds

Excavations within Mastaba 16 yielded fragmentary remains of the tomb's original equipment, though it was heavily plundered in antiquity. Finds included fragments of alabaster vessels, pieces of fine pottery, and remnants of the owner's false door, a critical element of the tomb's cult chapel. While no intact body was found, fragments of the sarcophagus were discovered in the burial chamber. Notably, no inscriptions definitively naming the tomb owner have been recovered, leaving his specific identity and titles a subject of ongoing scholarly analysis based on the tomb's impressive scale and location.