Generated by DeepSeek V3.2| Lean Startup | |
|---|---|
| Name | Lean Startup |
| Developer | Eric Ries |
| Influenced by | Lean manufacturing, Customer development, Agile software development, Design thinking, Bootstrapping (business) |
| Influenced | Lean canvas, Growth hacking, Minimum viable product, Continuous deployment, Steve Blank |
| Year | 2008 |
Lean Startup. The Lean Startup is a methodology for developing businesses and products that aims to shorten product development cycles and rapidly discover if a proposed business model is viable. It is heavily adapted from principles of Lean manufacturing and Agile software development, emphasizing validated learning, iterative product releases, and scientific experimentation. The approach advocates for building a Minimum viable product to test market hypotheses and using customer feedback to evolve the product without large initial funding or elaborate business plans.
The methodology was pioneered by entrepreneur and author Eric Ries, who coined the term in 2008 based on his experiences at IMVU and his study of Toyota's production philosophy. His ideas were significantly influenced by the work of Steve Blank on Customer development and the application of Lean manufacturing principles from Taiichi Ohno beyond the factory floor. The core philosophy was popularized through Ries's blog and his 2011 book *The Lean Startup*, published by Crown Business, which became a foundational text in Silicon Valley and global entrepreneurial circles. This movement represented a shift from traditional Waterfall model planning to a more adaptive, experiment-driven approach for startups in industries like SaaS, E-commerce, and Mobile app development.
Central to the methodology are the concepts of Validated learning and the Build-Measure-Learn feedback loop, which treat startup activities as a series of experiments to test a business model hypothesis. Entrepreneurs are urged to "get out of the building" and engage in Customer discovery to understand problems before building solutions, a tenet championed by Steve Blank at the University of California, Berkeley. The principle of Innovation accounting advocates for establishing actionable metrics, like AARRR metrics, over Vanity metrics to gauge progress objectively. Furthermore, it promotes operational agility through techniques like Continuous deployment and Split testing, allowing teams to pivot or persevere based on empirical evidence rather than intuition.
The practice begins with defining a problem hypothesis and developing a Minimum viable product—the simplest version of a product that allows a full turn of the Build-Measure-Learn loop. Techniques such as A/B testing, Landing page tests, and Concierge MVP are used to collect qualitative and quantitative data from early adopters. Based on insights, teams decide to make a minor adjustment (iterate) or a fundamental strategic change (pivot) to the product or business model. This iterative cycle is managed using Kanban or Scrum boards, and progress is tracked via Innovation accounting dashboards. The methodology has been institutionalized through accelerators like Y Combinator and educational programs at Harvard Business School and the Stanford Startup Garage.
Beyond Silicon Valley tech startups, the principles have been adopted by large corporations like General Electric through its FastWorks program, Intuit, and Dropbox to foster Intrapreneurship and manage Disruptive innovation. Government agencies, including the United States Agency for International Development and the United Kingdom's Government Digital Service, have used it for policy and service design. The methodology underpins the global Startup accelerator movement, influencing programs at Techstars and 500 Startups, and is a staple in entrepreneurship curricula worldwide. Its emphasis on bootstrapping and rapid experimentation has also shaped the Growth hacking strategies of companies like Airbnb and Groupon.
Critics, such as Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen, argue the focus on iterative testing may cause companies to miss Disruptive innovation by over-serving existing customers. Some venture capitalists, including Marc Andreessen of Andreessen Horowitz, have noted that the intense focus on metrics can lead to local maxima and discourage visionary, long-term moonshot projects. The methodology's applicability is questioned in capital-intensive or heavily regulated industries like Biotechnology or Aerospace, where rapid iteration is constrained. Furthermore, philosophers of science have debated whether the Build-Measure-Learn loop constitutes genuine scientific experimentation or merely confirms pre-existing biases within a limited customer segment.
Category:Business terms Category:Entrepreneurship Category:Product management