LLMpediaThe first transparent, open encyclopedia generated by LLMs

Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act

Generated by DeepSeek V3.2
Note: This article was automatically generated by a large language model (LLM) from purely parametric knowledge (no retrieval). It may contain inaccuracies or hallucinations. This encyclopedia is part of a research project currently under review.
Article Genealogy
Parent: Inspectors General Hop 4
Expansion Funnel Raw 33 → Dedup 0 → NER 0 → Enqueued 0
1. Extracted33
2. After dedup0 (None)
3. After NER0 ()
4. Enqueued0 ()
Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act
ShorttitleImproper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act
OthershorttitlesIPERA
LongtitleAn act to intensify efforts to identify, prevent, and recover payment error, waste, fraud, and abuse within Federal spending.
Enacted bythe 111th United States Congress
Effective dateJuly 22, 2010
Public lawPub. L. 111-204
Statutes at large124, 2224
Acts amendedImproper Payments Information Act of 2002
Titles amended31 U.S.C. (Money and Finance)
Sections created31, 3321 note, 31, 3561 et seq.
Sections amended31, 3321
Leghisturlhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/3393

Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act is a significant United States federal law enacted in 2010 to strengthen and expand government-wide efforts to reduce erroneous payments from federal programs. The legislation amended and built upon the foundational Improper Payments Information Act of 2002, introducing more rigorous reporting standards and recovery targets for federal agencies. Its passage reflected ongoing congressional concern over fiscal waste, particularly following high-profile audits by the Government Accountability Office and reports from the Office of Management and Budget.

Background and legislative history

The impetus for the legislation grew from persistent findings of substantial improper payments across major federal programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and Unemployment Insurance. Prior oversight efforts, including the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 and the earlier Improper Payments Information Act of 2002, had established frameworks for reporting but were deemed insufficient to compel aggressive action. Key legislative champions included Senator Tom Carper and Representative Patrick Murphy, who argued that tens of billions in annual errors demanded a stronger statutory response. The bill passed with broad bipartisan support during the 111th United States Congress and was signed into law by President Barack Obama on July 22, 2010, as Pub. L. 111-204.

Key provisions and requirements

The act mandates that all federal agencies annually review programs susceptible to significant improper payments and publish estimates of those payments. It lowered the monetary threshold defining "significant" improper payments, compelling more programs to undergo scrutiny. A central requirement is the establishment of annual reduction targets for each high-priority program, with agencies required to report on their progress to the Congress and the Office of Management and Budget. Furthermore, it intensified recovery auditing, requiring agencies to conduct recovery audits for all programs expending more than one million dollars annually and to recapture overpayments. The law also strengthened the role of agency Inspectors General in validating reported improper payment rates.

Implementation and oversight mechanisms

Primary implementation responsibility falls to the Office of Management and Budget, which issues guidance, such as Circular A-123, and monitors agency compliance. The Department of the Treasury plays a key role in managing the Do Not Pay Initiative, a centralized data-matching portal to prevent payments to ineligible recipients like deceased individuals or suspended contractors. Agency Chief Financial Officers and program managers are tasked with developing and executing corrective action plans. Oversight is conducted by the Government Accountability Office, which regularly audits implementation efforts, and by relevant congressional committees, including the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and the House Oversight and Accountability Committee.

Impact and effectiveness

Since enactment, the government-wide improper payment rate has fluctuated, with reported errors often exceeding one hundred billion dollars annually, highlighting the scale of the challenge. Programs like Medicare Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program remain high-risk areas. The Government Accountability Office has maintained improper payments on its High-Risk List, noting that while increased transparency and recovery efforts are positive, persistent weaknesses in internal controls hinder greater progress. Successes include billions of dollars identified for recovery through enhanced auditing and the prevention of payments via the Do Not Pay Initiative. However, achieving sustained reductions has proven difficult due to program complexity, outdated IT systems, and eligibility verification challenges.

The act is part of a continuum of federal financial management laws. It directly amended the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002, which it significantly strengthened. Subsequent legislation, including the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Improvement Act of 2012 (IPERIA) and provisions within the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014 (DATA Act), further expanded data analytics and reporting requirements. Its framework also interacts with broader statutes like the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019, which consolidated and updated improper payment laws. These ongoing legislative efforts reflect the enduring priority placed on payment integrity within the United States federal government. Category:United States federal financial management legislation Category:2010 in American law Category:111th United States Congress