Generated by DeepSeek V3.2| Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 | |
|---|---|
| Shorttitle | Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 |
| Othertitles | Hart–Celler Act |
| Enacted by | 89th |
| Effective date | June 30, 1968 |
| Cite public law | 89-236 |
| Acts amended | Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 |
| Introducedin | House |
| Introducedby | Michael A. Feighan (D–Ohio) |
| Introduceddate | January 13, 1965 |
| Committees | House Judiciary |
| Passedbody1 | House |
| Passeddate1 | August 25, 1965 |
| Passedvote1 | 320–70 |
| Passedbody2 | Senate |
| Passeddate2 | September 22, 1965 |
| Passedvote2 | 76–18 |
| Signedpresident | Lyndon B. Johnson |
| Signeddate | October 3, 1965 |
| Amendments | Immigration Act of 1990, Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 |
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 fundamentally transformed the demographic composition of the United States by abolishing the National Origins Formula, a system of immigration quotas based on national origin that had favored Northern Europe and severely restricted Asian immigration. Signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson at the foot of the Statue of Liberty, the legislation established a new preference system prioritizing family reunification and skilled immigrants. It is widely regarded as a cornerstone of the Civil Rights Movement, shifting American immigration policy away from explicit racial and ethnic discrimination and setting the framework for modern immigration patterns.
The impetus for reform stemmed from the growing moral and political repudiation of the racially restrictive Immigration Act of 1924 and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which had codified the National Origins Formula. Advocacy from the Civil Rights Movement, religious groups like the National Council of Churches, and key legislators such as Senator Philip Hart and Congressman Emanuel Celler built momentum for change. President John F. Kennedy had championed reform in his book A Nation of Immigrants, and his successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, made it a key part of his Great Society agenda. The bill faced significant opposition from conservatives like Senator Sam Ervin and groups such as the American Coalition of Patriotic Societies, who warned it would alter the nation's character, but it passed with strong bipartisan majorities in both the House and the Senate.
The act's core mechanism was a seven-category preference system, allocating visas primarily for family reunification (74%) and individuals with needed skills or professions (20%). It abolished the National Origins Formula, replacing country-specific quotas with a uniform annual ceiling of 20,000 immigrants per country within the Eastern Hemisphere, with an overall cap of 170,000. For the first time, it set a numerical limit (120,000) for immigration from the Western Hemisphere, though this was not based on the preference system initially. The law also established the INS as the primary administrative body and created a labor certification process through the Department of Labor to protect the domestic workforce. It formally ended the exclusionary practices against Asia embodied in laws like the Chinese Exclusion Act.
The demographic consequences were profound and largely unforeseen by its sponsors. Immigration from Europe, particularly Southern Europe and Eastern Europe, initially increased but was soon surpassed by waves from Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Countries like the Philippines, India, South Korea, the Dominican Republic, and Mexico became major sources of new Americans. This shift dramatically altered the ethnic and religious landscape of cities such as Los Angeles, New York City, and Miami. The emphasis on family reunification, or "chain migration," created self-perpetuating migration networks that sustained high levels of immigration from non-European nations, leading to the rise of a much more diverse, multi-ethnic society by the end of the 20th century.
The act was passed during the zenith of the Great Society and the Civil Rights Movement, framed as an extension of the moral imperative to end legal discrimination, following the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Key support came from a coalition of northern Democrats, liberal Republicans, organized labor groups like the AFL–CIO, and religious organizations. President Lyndon B. Johnson and Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach were forceful advocates. Opponents, often from the American South and conservative wings of both parties, framed their arguments around preserving cultural homogeneity and expressed concerns over economic competition, but their efforts were ultimately overwhelmed by the prevailing liberal consensus of the era.
The framework established by the act has been amended but remains the foundation of U.S. immigration law. The Immigration Act of 1990 increased total immigration levels, created the Diversity Immigrant Visa program, and refined employment-based categories. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 focused on enforcement and restrictions for undocumented immigrants. The act's legacy is dual-edged: it is celebrated for fostering America's modern diversity and ending explicitly racist quotas, but it is also critiqued for creating backlogs in the family preference system and for the unintended consequences of hemispheric caps, which contributed to rising undocumented immigration from Mexico and Central America. It permanently redefined the United States as a nation of immigrants from every corner of the globe.
Category:1965 in American law Category:United States federal immigration and nationality legislation Category:89th United States Congress