Generated by DeepSeek V3.2| Biology & Philosophy | |
|---|---|
| Title | Biology & Philosophy |
| Abbreviation | Biol. Philos. |
| Discipline | Philosophy of biology, History of biology, Theoretical biology |
| Language | English |
| Editor | Kim Sterelny |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Country | Netherlands |
| History | 1986–present |
| Frequency | Bimonthly |
| Openaccess | Hybrid |
| Impact | 2.0 |
| Impact-year | 2022 |
| ISSN | 0169-3867 |
| EISSN | 1572-8404 |
| OCLC | 12334567 |
| Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/10539 |
| LCCN | 87655234 |
Biology & Philosophy. It is a peer-reviewed academic journal established in 1986 that serves as a central forum for interdisciplinary work at the intersection of the life sciences and philosophical inquiry. The journal is published by Springer and is edited by prominent philosopher Kim Sterelny. Its scope encompasses the philosophy of biology, history of biology, and conceptual foundations of evolutionary theory, genetics, and ecology.
The journal was founded during a period of renewed interest in the philosophical implications of biological discoveries, particularly those emerging from the modern evolutionary synthesis. Early influential figures in the field, such as David Hull and Michael Ruse, contributed to shaping its direction, arguing for a naturalistic philosophy grounded in biological science. The establishment of the journal paralleled the growth of professional societies like the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology (ISHPSSB). Over the decades, it has chronicled philosophical engagements with major scientific developments, from the rise of cladistics and sociobiology to the genomic revolution following the Human Genome Project.
A primary focus is the nature of evolutionary theory, including debates over the units and levels of selection, involving figures like Richard Dawkins (gene-centered view) and Stephen Jay Gould (hierarchical selection). The journal extensively analyzes concepts like biological function, teleology, and adaptationism, often referencing the work of Ruth Millikan and Karen Neander. It also interrogates the concept of species, comparing the biological species concept of Ernst Mayr with alternatives like the phylogenetic species concept. Other persistent topics include the structure of scientific explanation in biology, the status of laws of nature in the historical sciences, and the reductionism debate concerning molecular biology versus organismal biology.
Articles frequently engage with evolutionary psychology and its philosophical underpinnings, critiquing approaches from researchers like Leda Cosmides and John Tooby. The framework of developmental systems theory (DST), advocated by Susan Oyama and Paul E. Griffiths, is a recurring subject, challenging gene-centric narratives. The journal has been a key venue for discussing extended evolutionary synthesis, which incorporates concepts like niche construction and epigenetics, associated with scientists such as Kevin Laland and Eva Jablonka. Philosophical analyses of self-organization and complexity from figures like Stuart Kauffman also feature prominently.
The journal bridges to the history of science, publishing work on figures like Charles Darwin, Gregor Mendel, and Alfred Russel Wallace. It connects with cognitive science through debates on innateness and modularity of mind. Ethical implications are explored in areas like conservation biology, synthetic biology, and biomedicine, often engaging with bioethics frameworks from institutions like the Hastings Center. There is significant crossover with anthropology and archaeology in discussions of human evolution, and with economics in analyses of evolutionary game theory pioneered by John Maynard Smith.
Current discussions often center on the impact of microbiome research on concepts of individuality and the holobiont, referencing work by Scott Gilbert. The philosophical implications of CRISPR and gene drive technologies are critically examined. Debates continue over the interpretation of inclusive fitness theory and Hamilton's rule, following critiques by Martin Nowak. The journal also hosts exchanges on the nature of information in biology, the reality of race as a biological category, and the challenges posed by big data in fields like systems biology and paleogenomics. The ongoing reassessment of major transitions in evolution remains a vibrant area of inquiry.
Category:Philosophy of biology Category:Philosophy journals Category:Biology journals Category:Springer Science+Business Media academic journals Category:Publications established in 1986